Category Archives: http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post

How Many Wrongs Make a Copyright?

This has tangential relevance to the Innocence of Muslims case (of which more soon).  I’ve written more directly about that case at the district court level, but this forthcoming publication deals with the idea of providing more protection to victims of … Continue reading

Posted in 230, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, my writings | Leave a comment

Deciding substantial similarity on a motion to dismiss

Klauber Bros., Inc. v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., 2014 WL 657953, No. 13–1672 (2d Cir. Feb. 21, 2014) Klauber appealed from the dismissal of its copyright claim against Bon-Ton.  It argued that the district court erred in finding no substantial similarity … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Horror retellings of children’s classics

Transformative works of the day: horrific retellings of children’s classics.  Are You My Mother? (a chilling story of self-delusion and parental feeling gone wrong);  If You Give a Mouse a Cookie (“He’s going to ask for a glass of milk/and … Continue reading

Posted in fanworks, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Lay mis/understandings of copyright

What do people think about copyright? Over at Jotwell, Andres Guadamuz reviews Lee Edwards et al, Isn’t it just a way to protect Walt Disney’s rights?: Media user perspectives on copyright, 16 New Media & Soc’y (2013) (paywall). The article … Continue reading

Posted in copying, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Dividing the spoils: soured Afghan deal brings TM, CFAA claims

Global Fleet Sales, LLC v. Delunas, 2014 WL 634075, No. 12–15471 (E.D. Mich., Feb. 18, 2014) “This dispute arises out of the pursuit of business opportunities in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan in the wake of the NATO campaign against … Continue reading

Posted in cfaa, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Informal administrative inquiry doesn’t preclude lawsuit over "organic"

Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., 2014 WL 556732, No. C 11–03082 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2014) (magistrate judge) Plaintiffs sued Hain alleging that it marketed its “Avalon Organics” and “Jason” cosmetic products as organic when they were not made … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

rigorous falsity standard in sophisticated market defeats false advertising claim

Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Foray Technologies, LLC, No. C 12-03762, 2014 WL 572290 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2014) Plaintiff (here VeriPic) and defendant both sell digital asset management software to law enforcement.  VeriPic and Foray both sell software that … Continue reading

Posted in contracts, copyright, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

A consumer protection case for Fox Mulder?

Hey, I get to make an X-Files reference! Lilly v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 644706 (9th Cir. Feb. 20, 2014) Lilly alleged that the tasty coating on sunflower seed shells is designed to be eaten, and … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

British villains, by which we mean Marvel’s Loki etc.

So what are the trademark implications of the Jaguar ads starring three British actors who tout their credentials as film villains?  Any copyright implications, since they’re evoking some of their characters?  The disclaimers don’t say a word about the franchises … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

FTC wins big in case against light bulb sellers

The FTC’s Business Center Blog has the details, which include a $21 million refund order representing the gross revenues from the advertised products, with no offsets for the benefit consumers actually received.  A very strong opinion for the FTC, requiring … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, ftc, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment