-
Recent Posts
- surveys/expert evidence of deception still not required in consumer protection claims
- when is a publisher sufficiently beholden to a manufacturer to engage in commercial speech?
- Happy inauguration day to Redbubble in particular: 9th Cir. affirms functionality in Lettuce Turnip the Beet
- Dastardly DoorDash fails to get restaurant complaint dismissed, including under UCL/FAL
- WVa SCt immunizes religious schools and camps for false advertising about services
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: patent
Reading list: Orly Lobel on employment law as IP law
Orly Lobel, The New Cognitive Property: Human Capital Law and the Reach of Intellectual Property. Abstract: Contemporary law has become grounded in the conviction that not only the outputs of innovation – artistic expressions, scientific methods, and technological advances – … Continue reading
NPR story on apple varieties and TM as substitute for patent
The story suggests that control over new varieties could last forever, instead of expiring as previous patents on new varities have, because the varieties are “trademarked.” Query: if the public knows the apple as SweeTango, why isn’t that word the … Continue reading
Posted in patent, trademark
Leave a comment
Guest post: Peter DiCola’s notes from Notre Dame roundtable on The Eureka Myth
Jessica Silbey’s _The Eureka Myth_ Book Roundtable at Notre Dame November 7th, 2014 Notes from Peter DiCola *Panel #1* 1) David Schwartz — Praise for the book — Will raise a few methodological issues — Issue of representativeness of the … Continue reading
Roundtable on Jessica Silbey’s The Eureka Myth
Roundtable on Jessica Silbey’s The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Everyday Intellectual Property University of Notre Dame Law School [I was very sorry that I arrived late due to a missed connection the previous night] Second Session: Distribution Models and … Continue reading
Empirical IP Research Conference, NYU
Plenary Session: How Do Patents Affect Innovation? Facilitator: Katherine Strandburg (NYU) Longer history of empirical work in patent, but still difficulty answering basic question of effect on innovation. In 1958, economist Fritz Machlup famously concluded that “none of the empirical … Continue reading
Mark Lemley is our king
But then, you knew that anyway. Here, have a list of the most cited IP articles over the past ten years, compiled with diligent effort by Ted Sichelman. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
SCIPR: statistics and preview of next Term
Supreme Court Analytics on the Past Term Professor Edward Lee, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Professor David Schwartz, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Small sample! 6 patent cases from Fed. Cir., 5 reversed and 1 affirmed; 2 reversals in © … Continue reading
SCIPR: patents (Alice/Nautilus)
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank (Patentable subject matter of software-related inventions) Nautilus v. Biosig Instruments (Patent indefiniteness) Moderator: Thomas Pasternak, Partner, Steptoe & Johnson LLP Panelists: Constantine Trela, Jr., Counsel to Alice Corp.; Partner, Sidley Austin LLP: Alice: We know … Continue reading
SCIPR: David Kappos keynote
Keynote Lecture: “Stalemate or Statesmen? What Is Needed to Move Forward Constructively with the Balancing of America’s IP System” Speaker: David Kappos, Partner, Cravath, Swaine & Moore We’ve demonstrated ability to achieve stalemate. Not likely to change unless we step … Continue reading
SCIPR, patents (Limelight/Medtronic)
(Ed. note: as is clear from my notes, I have a somewhat Gingerly approach to patent law. My apologies for any inaccuracies.) Limelight Networks v. Akamai Technologies (Induced infringement when defendants have not directly infringed.) Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures, … Continue reading