Category Archives: trademark

Actual confusion irrelevant when Rogers v. Grimaldi applies

Mil-Spec Monkey, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., No. 14-cv-02361 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2014)  MSM alleged that the video game Call of Duty: Ghosts made infringing use of MSM’s “angry monkey” mark, “among the most popular morale patch designs” MSM … Continue reading

Posted in first amendment, trademark | Leave a comment

plaintiff must identify elements of trade dress, specific false claims

Homeland Housewares, LLC v. Euro-Pro Operating LLC, 2014 WL 6892141, No. CV 14–03954 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2014) Previously, the court granted a preliminary injunction on certain false advertising claims and refused to stop the plaintiff from publicizing that.  Now … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Reading list: Putting Intellectual Property in Its Place

Laura J. Murray, S. Tina Piper, & Kirsty Robertson, Putting Intellectual Property in Its Place: Rights Discourses, Creative Labor, and the Everyday: Coming at roughly the same time as Jessica Silbey’s The Eureka Myth, this book, like Silbey’s, challenges IP … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, reading list, trademark | Leave a comment

A case peppered with TM and advertising issues

United Tactical Systems v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 2014 WL 6788310, No. 14-cv-04050 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2014) UTS sued RAP4 mostly over the trademark PepperBall; the court granted a preliminary injunction based on some of its claims.  Nonparty PepperBall … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trade secrets, trademark | Leave a comment

B&N almost entirely off the hook for copying backpack design

Rubio v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2014 WL 6769150, No. 14–CV–6561 (S.D.N.Y Nov. 11, 2014) Rubio sued her alma mater, the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) and Barnes & Noble, Inc. for copying her original drawing of a backpack, producing … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, right of publicity, standing, trademark, unfairness | Leave a comment

B&B v. Hargis: just one reaction

When I read the SG’s brief advocating for preclusion as an ordinary result, I was concerned that there was limited understanding of what a registration/opposition proceeding actually is compared to an infringement case.  For example, the SG assumed that in … Continue reading

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

Lamborghini going to pot?

If “anything can signify anything,” is this equation of a pot with a Lamborghini nominative fair use?  (It’s just an object. It doesn’t mean what you think.) Anything can signify anything billboard, Washington DC Photo by Zach Schrag. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

NPR story on apple varieties and TM as substitute for patent

The story suggests that control over new varieties could last forever, instead of expiring as previous patents on new varities have, because the varieties are “trademarked.” Query: if the public knows the apple as SweeTango, why isn’t that word the … Continue reading

Posted in patent, trademark | Leave a comment

The Eureka Myth: Reputation

Fourth Session: Reputation and Policy Take-Aways Abraham Drassinower: what does thinking about misalignment tell us how to think about IP?  Move from debunking eureka myth to debunking the myth of progress.  Misalignment of IP with its own justifications, needs of … Continue reading

Posted in attribution, copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Deadmau5 vs. Disney

I talk to American Public Media’s Stan Alcorn. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment