-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: trademark
falsely claiming continued TM ownership leads to liability
C=HOLDINGS B.V. v. Asiarim Corp., 2013 WL 6987165, No. 12 Civ. 928 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2013) C= sued Asiarim for infringement of Commodore trademarks (“a brand long associated with the 8–bit gaming computer popular in the early 1980s”) and related … Continue reading
trademark licensing and apparent agency
Pullman v. Alpha Media Publishing, Inc., No. 12–CV–1924, 2013 WL 1290409 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2013) (magistrate judge) Another old one coughed up by Westlaw. Interesting to me because of Maxim’s litigation based on its desire to license its brand in … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
keyword purchase supports unfair competition verdict
Chow v. Chak Yam Chau, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2014 WL 92094, No. 12–15994 (11th Cir. Jan. 10, 2014) Michael Chow credits himself with introducing “high-end Chinese cuisine in a fine dining setting to the west” through the “Mr Chow” restaurants … Continue reading
time to shell out for an IP lawyer
You can’t say Pom’s owners aren’t willing to pick a fight (or a fruit or nut). Also via Zach Schrag. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Hedging and bullying in trademark
Chicago State University attempts to intimidate a faculty blog into not identifying itself properly, using trademark law as its bullying tool/justification. This takes a turn for the silly as the university now objects to a picture of CSU hedges, trimmed … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Trademark strategy question of the day
MLA Subconference is “an independent and evolving group of graduate students in the humanities who are interested in creating a new kind of conference environment, in order to propose alternative professional, social, and political possibilities for ourselves and our peers.” … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Olympic rectangles?
Picture from nearby skating rink So, does the configuration of shirts sufficiently replicate the 5-ring symbol to trigger the protections found in US law? http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
the trademark joke is a tricky beast
For example: Me: Hi I’d like some cocaine please Dealer: is pepsicane ok? http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Guest post: Betsy Rosenblatt on the case of Sherlock Holmes’ two lives
Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., No. 13-cv-01226 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 23, 2013) I’m going to turn this over to Betsy Rosenblatt, current colleague/head of the legal committee of the Organization for Transformative Works and Assistant Professor of Law/Director, Center … Continue reading
The Cadillac of nominative fair use questions
Check out the tagline for this Thermador ad: “The Swiss Army Knife® for the Culinary Obsessive.” In the mouseprint footnote, there’s a link to the Thermador website and the statement “® Swiss Army is a registered trademark of Victorinox AG … Continue reading
Posted in dilution, trademark
Leave a comment