-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: trademark
competitor can challenge allegedly confusing use of certifier’s TM
First Data Merchant Services Corp. v. SecurityMetrics, Inc., 2013 WL 6234598, No. RDB–12–2568 (D. Md. Nov. 13, 2013) I’m only discussing the Lanham Act claims, but there are many other claims in this case. First Data and SecurityMetrics generally sit … Continue reading
9th Circuit resoundingly rejects presumption of irreparable harm in Lanham Act cases
Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Opinion Management, Inc., No. 12-16868 (9th Cir. Dec. 2, 2013) Fascinating to have this case come out just as I’m teaching remedies in my trademark class. The casebook (Ginsburg et al.) is hanging … Continue reading
Dilution is more than association: but what more?
The ECJ recently ruled on dilution as a ground for refusing registration. Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM), November 14, 2013 (Case C-383/12 P). If this is taken seriously, I can’t imagine how anyone … Continue reading
Posted in dilution, trademark
Leave a comment
A song about big data
Vienna Teng’s Hymn of Acxiom (bonus trademark question included). leave your life open. you don’t have to hide. someone is gathering every crumb you drop, these (mindless decisions and) moments you long forgot. keep them all. … is that wrong?isn’t … Continue reading
Posted in privacy, trademark
Leave a comment
eBay seller loses gray goods case
Bose Corporation v. Ejaz, No. 12-2403 (1st Cir. Oct. 4, 2013) Bose won summary judgment on its breach of contract and trademark claims against Ejaz, who sold home theater systems made by Bose for use in the US to other … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
distributor’s switch to direct sourcing leads to Lanham Act claim
Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. VWR Intern. LLC, No. 12–1615, 2013 WL 6179065 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 2013) One way to tell the story of this complaint: company decides to outsource production of a flagship product to China, gets burned … Continue reading
Bike humor
Via Bikearlington on Twitter. Hardly-Davidson “Born to be Mild” strikes me as a pretty good parody. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in dilution, parody, trademark
Leave a comment
Posner likes trademarks, hates surveys
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., No. 13‐2559 (7th Cir. Nov. 14, 2013) This is a classic Posner trademark opinion, with a combination of skepticism and credulity (about his favored theory of trademark) whose … Continue reading
Posted in surveys, trademark
Leave a comment
possible internet, eBay sales into US insufficient for jurisdiction
Gibson Brands Inc. v. Viacom Intern. Inc., 2013 WL 5940826, No. CV 12–10870 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2013) Gibson sued Viacom and JHS over a ukulele bearing the image of SpongeBob Squarepants formed in a V shape that allegedly infringed … Continue reading
Posted in jurisdiction, trademark
Leave a comment
I’m at io9
I did Ask a Law Professor Your Questions about Fan Fiction and Mash-ups at io9 yesterday. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss