-
Recent Posts
- trademark law firm loses trademark lawsuit
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: trademark
Trademark scholars roundtable: roles for the consumer in TM
Seventh Trademark Scholars Roundtable: The Construction of the Consumer in Trade Mark Law Session 1: Roles for the Consumer in Trade Mark Law What role does the “consumer” (whether “average” or “reasonable” or otherwise) play in trade mark law? … Continue reading
claim of "improved" version of competitor’s product not likely to confuse
Arborjet, Inc. v. Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements, Inc., 63 F.Supp.3d 149 (D. Mass. 2014) Arborjet sued Rainbow over an alleged breach of a sales agency agreement and won a preliminary injunction. Arborjet makes insect and pest control products for … Continue reading
London TM finds, food edition
“It’s All About the Base” pizza ad Chocolate boxes More chocolate boxes For the last one, compare this story from Australia about another chocolatier. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
London visit, TM and cultural property edition
All of This Belongs to You sign at the V&A Museum: cultural patrimony (though often of other cultures …) English Milky Way, apparently caramel-less, and Yorkie (note the Yorkie’s offer of Man Prizes, which I can only assume are … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
visiting London: TM edition
The band Camel Anathema, with a familiar font and presentation Spex in the City TK Maxx, aka TJ Maxx, apparently renamed in the UK to avoid conflict with retailer TJ Hughes http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Court throws shade on TM claimant’s naked licensing
Amscan Inc. v. Shutter Shades, Inc., No. 13-CV-1112 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 3015) Plaintiff Party City is a party goods retailer, and plaintiff Amscan makes party goods that it distributes to many retail outlets, including Party City. Defendant Shutter Shades … Continue reading
Posted in design patent, trademark
1 Comment
Amicus brief in Slep-Tone about scope of Dastar
Belatedly, I also participated in this amicus brief in Slep-Tone v. Canton Phoenix, now on appeal in the 9th Circuit, about an attempt to make an end run around lack of copyright ownership to assert trademark claims instead. Thanks to … Continue reading
Seventh Circuit engages in target practice on descriptive fair use
Sorensen v. WD-40 Co., No. 14-3067, 2015 BL 184918 (7th Cir. June 11, 2015) The Seventh Circuit continues its pattern of telling district judges just to eyeball cases in the expectation that they’ll be good enough to get it … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
In which I sue the government
So, remember when ICE held a press conference and claimed that disparaging a mark constituted counterfeiting? I ended up filing a FOIA request to figure out under what circumstances ICE took this position, and since it was denied, I am … Continue reading
Posted in my lawsuits, trademark
Leave a comment
Student athletes lose another right of publicity claim
Marshall v. ESPN Inc., No. 14-01945 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 4, 2015) Current and former student athletes who played NCAA football or basketball sued college conferences, networks, and licensors for violating their rights of publicity and foreclosing them from the … Continue reading
Posted in commercial speech, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment