-
Recent Posts
- Temu’s “cheaper and way better quality than Shein” claims were potentially falsifiable, not puffery
- Dueling geneologists: photo (c) claims allowed, but not Lanham Act or factual compilation claims
- false advertising’s injury requirement causes reverse passing off claim to fail
- laches, once established, bars Lanham Act claims even during more recent periods
- what particularity is required when an ad campaign has zillions of possibly algorithmic variants?
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: February 2015
Fair Use Week!
The OTW supports Fair Use Week. And if you support fair use, why not support the OTW? Also, I enjoyed Laura Quilter’s post on the uses of parody. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Trademark/right of publicity questions of the day
Via Mycokerewards: Do the referenced bands have any claims against Coke, assuming this was done without permission? Does New Kids apply to a promotional site like Mycokerewards? Do the comparisons/food jokes suffice for transformativeness? Coke’s “vote for your favorite food-inspired … Continue reading
Posted in right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
False claims of third-party endorsement actionable as false advertising
Fringe Insurance Benefits, Inc. v. Beneco, Inc., No. A–13–CV–034, 2015 WL 631181 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2015) (magistrate judge) The parties compete to provide employee benefit plans; FIBI and Beneco specialize in fringe benefit services to government contractors who … Continue reading
Transformative work of the day, superhero edition
Superhero keyboard skin, via Deborah Gerhardt. There’s only one problem with it (hint: check out the W). http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Allegations of fake independent reviews state false advertising claim
Swiss America Trading Corp. v. Regal Assets, LLC, 2015 WL 631569, No. CV 14–04960 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2015) Swiss competes with Regal to sell precious metals. The parties promote themselves online and rely on internet reviews and recommendations. … Continue reading
Misappropriating goodwill of abandoned mark is false advertising
ITEX Corp. v. Global Links Corp., No. 2:14–cv–00057, 2015 WL 557067 (D. Nev. Feb. 11, 2015) A false advertising theory might not work in every case of a new entity adopting an abandoned mark, but it proved fruitful for … Continue reading
Fox hurts America yet again, losing fair use sj motion
North Jersey Media Grp. Inc. v. Pirro, No. 13 Civ. 7153 (ER), 2015 BL 33458 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2015) Fair use should be nonpartisan; copyright restrictionists are generally liberal, but Fox deserves fair use too, even if it does … Continue reading
returned goods sold as new were infringing, false advertising
RFA Brands, LLC v. Beauvais, No. 13–14615, 2014 WL 7780975 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 23, 2014) Plaintiffs make various electronics and accessories, with various registered marks. They use the same warehouse to distribute their products, which is in Commerce Township, … Continue reading
New article on innovation in copyright licensing
Rebecca Tushnet, All of this Has Happened Before and All of this Will Happen Again: Innovation in Copyright Licensing, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 1447-1488, 2014 Abstract: Claims that copyright licensing can substitute for fair use have … Continue reading
Allegations of trademark "theft" falsifiable; other epithets puffery
Candyland, Inc. v. Cornfields, Inc., No. 14-3119 (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2015) Candyland, which sells popcorn, candy, and chocolate, sued Cornfields and Snyder’s Lance for trademark infringement and unfair competition based on their use of the mark Chicago Mix. … Continue reading