Monthly Archives: June 2015

failure to show damage from accusation of falsity dooms counterclaims

Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc., 2015 WL 3407882, No. C10–861 (W.D. Wash. May 27, 2015) This five-year odyssey ends with a whimper.  Cascade and KFI sell luxury yarns; Cascade initially sued KFI for mislabeling the fiber content of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

failure to show damage from accusation of falsity dooms counterclaims

Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. Knitting Fever, Inc., 2015 WL 3407882, No. C10–861 (W.D. Wash. May 27, 2015) This five-year odyssey ends with a whimper.  Cascade and KFI sell luxury yarns; Cascade initially sued KFI for mislabeling the fiber content of … Continue reading

Posted in damages, defamation, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

“designed to meet standard” doesn’t mean “meets standard,” court says

Caltex Plastics, Inc. v. Shannon Packaging Co., 2015 WL 3407889, No. 2:13–cv–06611 (C.D. Cal. May 27, 2015) Caltex makes polyethylene bags and laminated products for military and electronics. Shannon competes with Caltex.  The Department of Defense has a Qualified Products … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

"designed to meet standard" doesn’t mean "meets standard," court says

Caltex Plastics, Inc. v. Shannon Packaging Co., 2015 WL 3407889, No. 2:13–cv–06611 (C.D. Cal. May 27, 2015) Caltex makes polyethylene bags and laminated products for military and electronics. Shannon competes with Caltex.  The Department of Defense has a Qualified Products … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Can you patent the Barbra Streisand effect?

Lawyer sues EFF over its stupid patent of the month award. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1dcXocP

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Can you patent the Barbra Streisand effect?

Lawyer sues EFF over its stupid patent of the month award. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in defamation, first amendment, patents | Leave a comment