Monthly Archives: July 2015

Clearblue’s pregnancy test gets the blues: recall ordered for false advertising

Church & Dwight Co. v. SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics, GMBH, 2015 WL 4002468, No. 14–CV–585 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 2015)   A good old-fashioned false advertising case about pregnancy tests!  Prior opinion, refusing to dismiss the claims as preempted in light … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Clearblue’s pregnancy test gets the blues: recall ordered for false advertising

Church & Dwight Co. v. SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics, GMBH, 2015 WL 4002468, No. 14–CV–585 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 2015)   A good old-fashioned false advertising case about pregnancy tests!  Prior opinion, refusing to dismiss the claims as preempted in light … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies | Leave a comment

UK ad regulator disapproves of negative puffery

One big difference between the US and the EU in comparative advertising is that what we would consider negative puffery, like “overpriced,” the EU bans as not sufficiently objective.  In this ASA adjudication, the advertiser both ran a review site … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

UK ad regulator disapproves of negative puffery

One big difference between the US and the EU in comparative advertising is that what we would consider negative puffery, like “overpriced,” the EU bans as not sufficiently objective.  In this ASA adjudication, the advertiser both ran a review site … Continue reading

Posted in advertising, disclosures, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment