The NYT on Frederik Colting’s latest endeavor

I’m quoted in the story, though not in full–I think this is a very hard case that could go either way.  One real issue is whether the kiddie versions take any more of the expression of the works than a standard, reasonably detailed review–they recount the key elements of the plot, that’s for sure, but I’m not sure that suffices for substantial similarity in expression.  I think we should not too easily move to using fair use to defend reviews and summaries; though fair use is capacious, substantial similarity should have its own role to play.  And then, for fair use, I think the transformativeness inquiry could be quite interesting–does sanitizing On the Road for children inherently comment on it?  Does the fact that 2001: A Space Odyssey makes no sense in summary work as comment on it?

from Blogger http://ift.tt/2h2QuMa

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s