Court finds materiality of color questionable

Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon
Technologies, Co., No. 15-11521, — F. Supp. 3d —-, 2017 WL 1246327 (D.
Mass. Apr. 3, 2017)
The parties compete in the radon extraction business. Spruce
claimed that Festa falsely advertised its radon extraction fans in violation of
the Lanham Act; the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, M.G.L. ch. 93A; M.G.L.
c. 266, § 91 prohibiting false/unfair ads; and the common law of commercial disparagement.
Festa counterclaimed similarly. Spruce filed a motion for partial summary judgment,
which was denied.
Previously, the court enjoined Festa from using inaccurate
photos of Spruce’s fans and representing that Festa fans have Energy Star and
Home Ventilating Institute (HVI) certifications, and enjoined Spruce from
claiming that its fans were Energy Star certified. 
Spruce argued that it was entitled to summary judgment on
its claim that Festa’s promotions violated the Lanham Act and Chapter 93A
because they include a photo of a bright yellow Spruce fan when the fans are
actually a different shade of yellow or greyish-brown, which is material
because color is an inherent quality and because one of its potential customers
suggested in an email that color would affect his purchase decision.  But there were genuine issues of material
fact about whether the photo properly represented the fans; there was evidence
that the photo wasn’t manipulated and thus might not be literally false, and
the fans did become more yellow over time. 
Also, the email was hearsay and there was no other evidence of
materiality.  “[I]t is unclear whether
consumers would find that the difference between the bright yellow in the
advertisement and the yellow tint that admittedly develops is an inherent
quality.” Also, since the fan was supposed to remove radon, not to be
decorative, color might never be an inherent quality.  Injury was also a matter for factfinding.
Likewise for Festa’s Energy Star rating, which Festa
conceded was expired at the time of the ads. Spruce didn’t show that it was
injured, and there was an unclean hands problem as well; Spruce also made
literally false statements that two models were Energy Star rated.  Similarly, Festa allegedly falsely advertised
using photos that included HVI certification labels even though that
certification had expired. Festa responded that the small labels in the stock
photos were indecipherable and there was no evidence that consumers were
materially misled; the court agreed that there were genuine factual issues.

Similar factual issues precluded summary judgment on Festa’s

from Blogger

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s