Arbitral immunity doesn’t extend to arbitral advertising

Hopper v. American Arbitration Association, Inc., 2017 WL
6569571, No. 16-55573 (9th Cir. Dec. 7, 2017)

The district court dismissed Hopper’s false advertising
claim against AAA based on arbitral immunity, and the court of appeals
reversed.  “Arbitral immunity extends to
claims that arise out of a decisional act and exists to ‘protect the
decision-maker from undue influence and protect the decision-making process
from reprisals by dissatisfied litigants.’” But the false advertising claim was
“predicated on AAA’s descriptions of its arbitrators disseminated through its
website and direct mail. Commercial advertisement, designed to sway individuals
to choose AAA over its competitors … is distinct and distant from the
decisional act of an arbitrator.” 
Allowing the false advertising claim to proceed wouldn’t lead to undue
influence over the arbitration process or expose arbitral decisions to
reprisals.

from Blogger http://ift.tt/2lkaJHg

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s