circumventing insurance can violate consumer protection law

Franks v Sykes, No.
W2018-00654-SC-R11-CV, 2020 WL 2097544, — S.W.3d — (Tenn. May 1, 2020)
I usually try to
stick to advertising-related UDAP claims but this practice was just so
astonishingly awful that I could not resist.  Plaintiffs were injured in car accidents and
received hospital treatment. Instead of billing plaintiffs’ insurance companies
for the negotiated rates, the hospitals instead filed liens against the
plaintiffs’ claims for damages for the “full amount” (scare quotes because of
how badly medical billing works in this country). The Kentucky Supreme Court
held that its state consumer protection law applied to health care providers
when they are acting in their business capacities, although it doesn’t apply to
treatment (which is not a “consumer transaction”).
Rule: “[W]hen a
plaintiff alleges an injury caused by a health care provider’s business
practices—including, but not limited to, deceptive practices in advertising,
billing, or collections—the plaintiff may state a claim under the Act. When a
plaintiff asserts a claim that an injury is caused by a health care provider’s
professional conduct, such as a deviation from the applicable standard of medical
care, then the Act does not apply because that claim would be based on medical
negligence under the Tennessee Health Care Liability Act.”

from Blogger

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s