Author Archives: rtushnet

Must false advertising claims always be pled with particularity?

LT Int’l Ltd. v. Shuffle Master, Inc., 2014 WL 1248270, No. 2:12–cv–1216 (D. Nev. March 26, 2014) Here, the court disapproved a five-page complaint, finding that the false advertising and related claims sounded in fraud but didn’t satisfy Rule 9(b), … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, procedure | Leave a comment

A mocking Snickers ad and Google v. Garcia

Sociological Images covers a Snickers ad that apparently shows real women responding to supportive, nonsexist comments from construction workers. “The first thing women do is get uncomfortable, revealing how a lifetime of experience makes them cringe at the prospect of … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Organic v. natural

Via an eagle-eyed student, a great video on misleading “natural” claims.  Note that the organization promotes organic products—is it subject to Lanham Act claims by a producer of “natural” foods? http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in advertising, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Relevant to my interests: Jensen Ackles and the right of publicity

It is a truth universally acknowledged that Jensen Ackles is a very attractive man.  So attractive that he tends to show up in a variety of advertising contexts that, I suspect, his agent does not know about.  Consider this example, … Continue reading →

Posted in fanworks, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, right of publicity, trademark | Leave a comment

Taco Bell endorsed by Ronald McDonalds

H/T Deborah Gerhardt. Via AdAge: Ronald McDonald loves Taco Bell’s breakfast. That’s what Taco Bell is saying in its campaign introducing its biggest menu rollout yet. The Mexican food chain located a slew of actual Ronald McDonalds and got them … Continue reading →

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

use of an established mark as false advertising

Topek, LLC v. W.H. Silverstein, Inc., No. 12–cv–494, 2014 WL 1124311, 2014 DNH 060 (D.N.H. Mar. 20, 2014) This colorful business dispute caught my eye because “false advertising through use of a trademark” cases are so rare, and this opinion … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

We all stand: Static Control can sue

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., No. 12–873 (March 25, 2014) Justice Scalia, writing for a unanimous Court, affirmed the Sixth Circuit, in the process articulating a new standard: “To invoke the Lanham Act’s cause of action for … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

ASA approves Microsoft’s ad accusing Gmail of creepy spying

Microsoft Corporation, No. A13-251580: Microsoft ran an ad beginning, “Ymay ivatepray e-mailway isway onway ofway eirthay usinessbay.” It continued: “Pig Latin may be hard to understand, but you probably need it if you use Gmail, because Gmail scans every word of your … Continue reading →

Posted in advertising, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, privacy | Leave a comment

I feel so extraordinary: Lexmark affirmed

Here.  My first Supreme Court citation!  And approving, no less!  More later. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

show me how you do that trick: magic performance copyrightable, infringed

Teller v. Dogge, No. 12-cv-00591 (D. Nev. Mar. 20, 2014) Teller sued Dogge for infringement in two YouTube videos offering to sell the secret to a signature Teller illusion, Shadows.  This illusion consists of a spotlight trained on a vase … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment