Author Archives: rtushnet

Misleading health plan names

NYT on how health plan names confuse and deceive consumers. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in advertising, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Consumer law and copyright conferences in April

Making the Fine Print Fair, Georgetown Law symposium, April 4 The Georgetown Consumer Law Society and Citizen Works are hosting a symposium, Making the Fine Print Fair, at Georgetown on April 4 from 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.  From the … Continue reading →

Posted in contracts, copyright, disclosures, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

I *am* only cheerleading: uniforms not conceptually separable

Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC, No. 10-cv-02508 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 1, 2014) “Classical philosophy does not often come to play in the field of mundane legal analysis.” But here the court was called on to identify the essence … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

infringement can occur even if consumers don’t remember it

Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co., No. 12 Civ. 6065 (SDNY Mar. 18, 2014) The Beastie Boys sued for copyright infringement and trademark infringement based on Monster’s allegedly unauthorized use of Beastie Boys music to accompany a video promoting a … Continue reading →

Posted in damages, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Hockey fans sue over fake beer sizes because they’re false and deceptive

There, I fixed the headline of the original story.  If a small costs $4 and a large costs $7, there ought to be a difference in amount delivered.  Also, anyone who uses the McDonald’s hot coffee case to “prove” that … Continue reading →

Posted in advertising, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Reliability, safety, and 1050-1150 RPM speed claims are puffery

Smith v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 2014 WL 989742, No. C 13-4361 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2014) Smith sued LG over allegedly defective washing machines that shook and vibrated excessively during use.  In 2012, the CPSC recalled the machines due … Continue reading →

Posted in california, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Copyright infringement doesn’t violate the Lanham Act

Masck v. Sports Illustrated, No. 13-10226 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 10, 2014) Previous discussion, in which I got exercised about the court’s misapplication of Dastar, herein corrected.  Masck took an “iconic” photo of defendant Desmond Howard, running for a touchdown during … Continue reading →

Posted in damages, dastar, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Today’s inducement question

#McConnelling: The Daily Show invites users to score footage of Mitch McConnell to as many songs as possible.  The idea is that it’s funny no matter what music you use.  So, inducement?  If it’s transformative (which I think it is), … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, secondary liability | Leave a comment

My long, sad Garcia v. Google post

You know, for a judge who loves the First Amendment and free speech so much when it comes to the right of publicity and nominative fair use, Judge Kozinski can seem oddly unconcerned about it in other areas of IP, … Continue reading →

Posted in google, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

pregnancy center isn’t commercial speaker; common sense can’t justify mandated disclosure

Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery County, No. DKC 10–1259, 2014 WL 923230 (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2014) The court enjoins Montgomery County’s attempts to make an anti-abortion counseling center conspicuously disclose that they don’t have medical personnel on staff and that … Continue reading →

Posted in commercial speech, disclosures, first amendment | Leave a comment