-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: advertising
The ASA and ads for offensive products
The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority would seem to have a particular remit: advertising. A recent adjudication, however, suggests that the ASA will go beyond that, at least online. Zazzle Inc, No. A13-247896, involved a complaint that Zazzle’s offering of a … Continue reading
Posted in advertising
Leave a comment
Blurred lines, part 3
Panel 3: The Way Forward on Transparency: A discussion of best practices Moderator: Mary K. Engle, Associate Director, Division of Advertising Practices, FTC Examples of native ads: “sponsored” story, labeled as such in gray at the top of the headline, … Continue reading
Posted in advertising, disclosures, ftc
Leave a comment
Blurred lines: really part 2 this time
Sorry for earlier posting difficulties. The Lessons of Nauru Bob Garfield, Co-host of On the Media and MediaPost columnist Nauru: was wealthy; phosphate resource from centuries of built up guano was valuable, but only took 50 years to destroy, and … Continue reading
Posted in advertising, disclosures, ftc
Leave a comment
Blurred Lines: Advertising or Content? An FTC Workshop on Native Advertising
Blurred Lines: Advertising or Content? An FTC Workshop on Native Advertising Welcoming Remarks: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman, FTC Advertising integrated into digital content. Recent survey of online publishers: 73% offer native advertising opportunities and 17% considering. 41% of brands and many … Continue reading
Posted in advertising, ftc
Leave a comment
perils of automated recommendation ads
A promotional e-mail from Spotify included the text “Have you heard this song by Lily Allen? Give it a try. Fuck You.” The ASA upheld a complaint against the ad. Though consumers were targeted for the ad because of previous genres … Continue reading
Posted in advertising
Leave a comment
Misleading health insurance letters?
Report on letters discouraging consumers from investigating cheaper alternatives and subsidies here at Talking Points Memo. Exercise for the reader: what’s the potential for Lanham Act and state consumer protection law claims (in states that don’t exclude insurance from the coverage … Continue reading
Reading list: empirical study of fertility clinic advertising
Jim Hawkins, Selling ART: An Empirical Assessment of Advertising on Fertility Clinics’ Websites, 88 Indiana Law Journal 1147 (2013) (SSRN version): Nice study on what claims clinics actually make versus what claims scholars have worried about—answer, some overlap but not … Continue reading
Posted in advertising, reading list
Leave a comment
When is a sale not a sale?
When employees are directed to pretend it isn’t unless you’re a preferred customer, Mark Ellwood writes in Slate. I’m guessing that if a small sign stating “sale” is a legal requirement, the NY AG wouldn’t be happy with the deceptive … Continue reading
law barring "surcharge for credit" signs unconstitutional
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 13 Civ. 3775, 2013 WL 5477607 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2013) Under NY GBL § 518, a vendor who wants to impose a surcharge for using a credit card to compensate for the credit card companies’ … Continue reading
Samsung made a vid (sort of) as an ad
The wrist-phone has been long promised, as this Samsung ad indicates. Vidding is the act or process of creating a fan-oriented video or “fanvid” using live-action TV or movie footage set to music (or other audio). The Samsung ad even … Continue reading