Tag Archives: Challenging materiality when literal falsity is conceded false advertising

Challenging materiality when literal falsity is conceded

Smart Vent, Inc. v. USA Floodair Vents, Ltd., 193 F.Supp.3d 395 (D.N.J. 2016) Smart Vent alleged patent infringement and false advertising related to competitor Floodair’s flood vents, which it allegedly falsely claimed to be certified by various bodies.  The regulations … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment