Tag Archives: Second Circuit narrowly interprets materiality for Lanham Act purposes false advertising

Second Circuit narrowly interprets materiality for Lanham Act purposes

Apotex Inc. v. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2016 WL 2848911, No. 14–4353–cv (2d Cir. May 16, 2016)   The parties compete to make tizanidine, a drug for treating spasticity. Apotex alleged that Acorda (i) filed a sham citizen … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment