Tag Archives: “tested and certified” can be false if in fact products were merely “certified” by non-tester false advertising

“tested and certified” can be false if in fact products were merely “certified” by non-tester

Wedi Corp. v. Wright, 2021 WL 1054463, No. 20-35242 (9th Cir. Mar. 3, 2021) Wedi alleged that three statements were literally false in violation of the Lanham Act and the Washington Consumer Protection Act: All Hydro-Blok Products Are IAPMO Tested … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment