Monthly Archives: July 2015

And his fate is still unlearn’d: Subway overcharge claim fails

Posted on July 10, 2015 by rtushnet

Hollander v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority, 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 50991(U), 2015 WL 4077193, No. 160972/13 (Sup. Ct. June 25, 2015)   Hollander sued the MTA on behalf of purchasers of 7–Day and 30–Day MetroCards, alleging they were falsely advertised because … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

And his fate is still unlearn’d: Subway overcharge claim fails

Posted on July 10, 2015 by rtushnet

Hollander v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority, 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 50991(U), 2015 WL 4077193, No. 160972/13 (Sup. Ct. June 25, 2015)   Hollander sued the MTA on behalf of purchasers of 7–Day and 30–Day MetroCards, alleging they were falsely advertised because … Continue reading →

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

A rant on the Copyright Office’s Orphan Works proposal

Posted on July 9, 2015 by rtushnet

And it’s not even from me!  As a dedicated ranter, however, I must recognize greatness in ranting when it appears.  Kyle Courtney, my hat’s off to you. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1D3axfd

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A rant on the Copyright Office’s Orphan Works proposal

Posted on July 9, 2015 by rtushnet

And it’s not even from me!  As a dedicated ranter, however, I must recognize greatness in ranting when it appears.  Kyle Courtney, my hat’s off to you. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in copying, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Reading list: Christine Jolls on visual disclosures

Posted on July 7, 2015 by rtushnet

Christine Jolls, Debiasing Through Law and the First Amendment, 67 Stan. L. Rev. 1411 (2015): Law often compels the disclosure of information in particular—and, increasingly today, in visual—forms. Some judges conclude that such modern disclosure requirements break with the First … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Reading list: Christine Jolls on visual disclosures

Posted on July 7, 2015 by rtushnet

Christine Jolls, Debiasing Through Law and the First Amendment, 67 Stan. L. Rev. 1411 (2015): Law often compels the disclosure of information in particular—and, increasingly today, in visual—forms. Some judges conclude that such modern disclosure requirements break with the First … Continue reading →

Posted in advertising, disclosures, first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, reading list | Leave a comment

Exaggerated and outdated photos literally false, court rules

Posted on July 6, 2015 by rtushnet

Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon Technologies, Co., 2015 WL 4038802, No. 15–11521 (D. Mass. July 2, 2015)   Spruce and Festa compete in the radon mitigation industry, selling products for testing and reducing indoor levels of the colorless … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Venable on notable NAD product name ruling

Posted on July 6, 2015 by rtushnet

Amy Mudge and Randall Shaheen explain the NAD’s take on product names: if you put two terms together, as in “Nourishing Coconut Shampoo,” the ingredient has to provide the benefit.  If not, it has to be called “Nourishing Shampoo with … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Exaggerated and outdated photos literally false, court rules

Posted on July 6, 2015 by rtushnet

Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon Technologies, Co., 2015 WL 4038802, No. 15–11521 (D. Mass. July 2, 2015)   Spruce and Festa compete in the radon mitigation industry, selling products for testing and reducing indoor levels of the colorless … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Venable on notable NAD product name ruling

Posted on July 6, 2015 by rtushnet

Amy Mudge and Randall Shaheen explain the NAD’s take on product names: if you put two terms together, as in “Nourishing Coconut Shampoo,” the ingredient has to provide the benefit.  If not, it has to be called “Nourishing Shampoo with … Continue reading →

Posted in advertising, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment