My forthcoming article on 2(a) and the First Amendment

Rebecca Tushnet, The First
Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech
, Notre
Dame Law Review (forthcoming)

 This Essay analyzes the First Amendment arguments against
§2(a)’s disparagement bar with reference to the consequences of any
invalidation on the rest of the trademark statute.  Ultimately, given the differences—or lack
thereof—between disparagement and other bars in the statute, I conclude that
§2(a) is generally constitutional as a government determination about what
speech it is willing to approve, if not endorse.  If the Supreme Court disagrees, it will face
a difficult job distinguishing other aspects of trademark law.  And these difficulties signal a greater
problem: the Court has lost touch with the reasons that some content-based
distinctions might deserve special scrutiny. 
Often, perfectly sensible and by no means censorious regulations that
depend on identifying the semantic content of speech would fall afoul of a real
application of heightened scrutiny, to no good end. 

from Blogger http://ift.tt/1QLGorh

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s