we said the meal was a “value,” we just didn’t say to whom

Killeen v. McDonald’s Corp., 2018 WL 1695366, No. 17 CV 874
(N.D. Ill. Apr. 6, 2018)
Courts will only rarely protect consumers against their
inability in the moment to do math; this is not one of those times. Killeen
alleged that some of McDonald’s “Extra Value” meals were actually more
expensive than ordering the same items separately, and that this was deceptive.
For example, Killeen bought a Sausage Burrito Extra Value Meal at a Chicago
McDonald’s for $5.08 when she would have paid only $4.97 had she ordered the
individual items a la carte. “[C]ommon experience favors her assertion that
consumers expect to pay less for items bundled together and billed as a ‘value’
package than they would pay if they purchased the items separately.” But there
can be no deception where other information is readily available to dispel the
tendency to believe in savings:
[A]nyone familiar with fast-food
restaurants such as McDonald’s surely knows that prices are typically displayed
on menus located near the registers. Understandably, plaintiff may not have
wished to take the time to compare prices, but there is no question that doing
so would have dispelled the deception on which her claims are based.
Accordingly, this is not a case in which consumers would have to consult an
ingredients list or other fine print to determine whether prominent images or
labels a defendant uses in connection with its product accurately reflect the
product’s true nature or quality.

from Blogger https://ift.tt/2IIlhsG

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s