reasonable consumers wouldn’t think Dunkin Donuts Angus Steak was intact piece of meat

Chen v. Dunkin’
Brands, Inc., No. 18-3087-cv, — F.3d —-, 2020 WL 1522826 (2d Cir. Mar. 31,
2020)
Plaintiffs sued Dunkin
for deceptively marketing the Angus Steak & Egg Breakfast Sandwich and the
Angus Steak & Egg Wake-Up Wrap, alleging that Dunkin deceived consumers
into believing that the Products contained an “intact” piece of meat when the products
actually contained a ground beef patty with multiple additives. There wasn’t
jurisdiction over the out of state plaintiffs’ claims, and no reasonable
consumer would have been fooled under GBL §§ 349 and 350.

All three challenged
ads “conclude with multiple zoomed-in images that clearly depict the ‘steak’ in
the Products as a beef patty.” And “steak” doesn’t always mean a slice of meat;
 it is also defined as “ground beef
prepared for cooking or for serving in the manner of a steak” by the Merriam-Webster
Online Dictionary, as in chopped steak, hamburger steak, and Salisbury steak.  In the context—the sandwiches cost less than
$4 and less than $2 respectively, and they’re marketed as grab-and-go products
that can be consumed in hand, without the need for a fork and knife—a
reasonable consumer would not be misled into thinking she was purchasing an “unadulterated
piece of meat.”

from Blogger https://ift.tt/2XI4DnW

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s