fake not-really-third-party reviews can be commercial advertising or promotion

Sanho Corp. v. KaiJet Tech. Int’l Ltd., No.
1:18-cv-05385-SDG, 2020 WL 4346881 (N.D. Ga. Jul. 29, 2020)

Sanho owns rights in a design patent that claims the
ornamental design for a multi-function docking station colloquially known as
the “HYPERDRIVE,” and a design patent “directed at the technology underlying
Sanho’s HYPERDRIVE product.” [???] It sued KaiJet for misappropriation and

KaiJet US counterclaimed for, among other things, false
advertising under the Lanham Act. It alleged that Sanho paid third parties— “falsely
disguised as independent reviewers, not paid-for advertisement—to submit positive
reviews of Sanho’s HYPERDRIVE product on various online platforms,” and “to
remove negative reviews of Sanho’s product.” Sanho argued that this wasn’t “commercial
advertising or promotion,” but the court disagreed, rightly without needing
much analysis. That the reviews purported to come from a third party did not
take them outside the scope of the Lanham Act if they did in fact come from
Sanho (which of course remains to be seen).

from Blogger https://ift.tt/2DU8sib

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s