Author Archives: rtushnet

The dangers of only arguing one half of 43(a)

Diodato v. Wells Fargo Ins. Servs., USA, Inc., 44 F. Supp. 3d 541 (M.D. Pa. 2014) Darrell Diodato was employed by Wells Fargo Insurance for thirty-six years as an insurance producer, servicing existing insurance business and originating new insurance business. … Continue reading →

Posted in defamation, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, procedure, right of publicity | Leave a comment

briefly noted: another court rejects proof of purchase requirement for class ascertainability

Really briefly!  In re Scotts EZ Seed Litig. 304 F.R.D. 397 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).  It would defeat the purpose of class actions.  Also, though, there couldn’t be an injunctive relief class after the challenged statement was removed from packaging. from Blogger … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Court makes the write choice on descriptive fair use

Marketquest Group, Inc. v. BIC Corp., No. 11-cv-618 BAS (S.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2015)   Marketquest website using All In One and The Write Choice marks Marketquest sued BIC for infringing its registrations for ALL-IN-ONE and THE WRITE CHOICE for, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

briefly noted: another court rejects proof of purchase requirement for class ascertainability

Really briefly!  In re Scotts EZ Seed Litig. 304 F.R.D. 397 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).  It would defeat the purpose of class actions.  Also, though, there couldn’t be an injunctive relief class after the challenged statement was removed from packaging. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in class actions, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Court makes the write choice on descriptive fair use

Marketquest Group, Inc. v. BIC Corp., No. 11-cv-618 BAS (S.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2015)   Marketquest website using All In One and The Write Choice marks Marketquest sued BIC for infringing its registrations for ALL-IN-ONE and THE WRITE CHOICE for, … Continue reading →

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

Needless markup: outlet stores’ pricing not deceptive

Rubenstein v. Neiman Marcus Group LLC, 2015 WL 1841254, No. CV 14–07155 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2015)   Rubenstein bought two items of clothing from the Neiman Marcus Last Call Store (a discount store, as opposed to the usual upscale … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Needless markup: outlet stores’ pricing not deceptive

Rubenstein v. Neiman Marcus Group LLC, 2015 WL 1841254, No. CV 14–07155 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2015)   Rubenstein bought two items of clothing from the Neiman Marcus Last Call Store (a discount store, as opposed to the usual upscale … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

So, that happened: MPAA Creativity Conference

The Motion Picture Association of America, in partnership with Microsoft and ABC News Creativity Conference (File under: you invited me!  Also, no surprise, the food was good and the perks nice—you could get your photo made in a James Bond … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

So, that happened: MPAA Creativity Conference

The Motion Picture Association of America, in partnership with Microsoft and ABC News Creativity Conference (File under: you invited me!  Also, no surprise, the food was good and the perks nice—you could get your photo made in a James Bond … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Deducting points for a 3-point landing in copyright claim

Horizon Comics Prods., Inc. v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, No. 15-cv-11684 (D. Mass. filed Apr. 23, 2015): Newly filed; the claim is that movie Iron Man’s armor infringes the copyright in another comic armored suit.  All I’ll say right now is that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment