Tag Archives: consumer protection

All in the game: misleading tennis racquet endorsements don’t support class certification

Ono v. Head Racquet Sports USA, Inc., No. CV 13–4222, 2016 WL 6647949 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2016)| Ono sued Head for deceiving the public “into believing that top-ranked professional tennis players actually used [Tour–Line Racquets] during competition,” bringing the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

failure to caption music/songs doesn’t make “close captioned” label misleading

Anthony v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment Inc., 2016 WL 6836950, No. 2:15–cv–09593 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2016) Plaintiffs, who are deaf or hard of hearing, alleged that defendants sold (1) DVDs enclosed in packaging with language advertising the DVDs as … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Unrelated cy pres recipient and disfavored coupon offer doom settlement approval

Hofmann v. Dutch LLC, No. 14-cv-02418, 2017 WL 840646 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2017) The court rejected plaintiff’s unopposed third motion for preliminary approval of the proposed class settlement in this case involving allegedly false “Made in the USA” claims … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Another fake discount allegation survives challenge to plaintiff’s theory of harm

Munning v. The Gap, Inc., 2017 WL 733104, No.16-cv-03804 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2017) Munning bought a pair of swim trunks from the Gap Factory retail website, and one dress and one sweater from the Banana Republic Factory website, each … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Disgorgement isn’t distinguishable from restitution in ordinary consumer protection case

Brazil v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, 660 Fed.Appx. 531 (9th Cir. 2016) Brazil brought the usual California claims, alleging that defendants deceptively described their fruit products as “All Natural Fruit.” Brazil property alleged that Dole’s labels were deceptive given that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Another “omissions about slave labor” case fails in Cal.

Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 15-cv-03783, 2017 WL 345994 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2017) Sud brought the usual California claims based on allegations that Costco sold prawns for which the supply chain was tainted by slavery, human trafficking, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Are you being served? Omission claim based on “virtualized” server survives

Schellenbach v. GoDaddy.com LLC, 2017 WL 192920, No. CV-16-00746 (D. Ariz. Jan. 18, 2017) In 2014, GoDaddy issued a press release titled “GoDaddy Launches New Dedicated and VPS Servers with Added Support for Designers and Developers.” Plaintiffs are website designers … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Can bait & switch cause actionable harm even though the consumer knows the price at checkout?

Veera v. Banana Republic, LLC, — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, 2016 WL 7242539, No. B270796 (Ct. App. Dec. 15, 2016) This decision, over a dissent, finds standing under the usual California statutory claims to challenge an alleged bait-and-switch scheme by Banana Republic, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Initial interest false advertising (aka bait and switch) in Google ads

Beacon Plumbing & Mechanical Inc. v. Sposari Inc., 2016 WL 5795282, No. C15-1613 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 17, 2016) Beacon sued defendants, including Sposari, which does buisiness as Mr. Rooter Plumbing Services, for trademark infringement and dilution (federal claim dismissed) and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Celebrity spokesperson isn’t directly liable under California consumer protection law

Luman v. Theismann, 647 Fed.Appx. 804 (9th Cir. 2016) Plaintiffs sued NAC Marketing Company and Joe Theismann for their advertising statements about NAC’s Super Beta Prostate product, bringing warranty claims as well as the usual California statutory claims.  Because one … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment