-
Recent Posts
- False endorsement claim can proceed against gov’t issued license plates and gov’t facility named for Roberto Clemente
- Non-TM owner can use 43(a) to challenge confusing use
- 11th Circuit affirms defense TM verdict; evidence of confusion is not evidence of harm for disgorgement
- CFP: Yale/Harvard/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum, May 21-22
- court rejects TM owner’s attempt to require full chain of custody for first sale defense, but where is the burden of proof?
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: consumer protection
omission of FedEx’s role in embryo transport was potentially deceptive
S.W. v. Cryoport, Inc., 2025 WL 1421909, No. 8:24-cv-02212-AH-(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2025) Tragic facts in this consumer protection case. Plaintiffs underwent IVF treatments in 2019 to preserve their options, resulting in six cryopreserved healthy embryos. They contracted with … Continue reading
omissions-based deceptiveness claims are easier to bring in Cal. than NY
Gamino v. Spin Master, Inc., No. ED CV 23-2242-DMG (SPx), 2025 WL 1421907 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2025) California and New York residents sued the manufacturers of certain children’s toys they purchased, “Orbeez water beads,” alleging the water beads pose … Continue reading
court applies issue preclusion to a jury verdict under a different state consumer protection law
Dent v. Premier Nutrition Corp., 2025 WL 1282627, No. 16-cv-06721-RS (N.D. Cal. May 2, 2025) Here, the court applies issue preclusion against Premier, makers of Joint Juice, which lost a bellwether-type trial under NY law (a ruling affirmed in relevant … Continue reading
Burger King’s ads may have told a whopper about burger size
Coleman v. Burger King Corp., 2025 WL 1294605, No. 22-cv-20925-ALTMAN/Reid (S.D. Fla. May 5, 2025) Nineteen plaintiffs brought claims under 13 states’ laws alleging that BK falsely advertised the size/amounts of ingredients in various burgers; the court denied BKC’s motion … Continue reading
package claim that required users to double serving size and add ingredient was plausibly misleading despite disclaimer
Mencia-Montes v. Fit Foods Distrib., Inc., 2025 WL 1185372, No. 24-cv-01768-EKL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2025) Courts in the 9th Circuit have increasingly held, in consumer protection cases, that an asterisk puts the consumer on notice of important qualifications. But … Continue reading
“defeat devices” in trucks plausibly deceptive because they rendered vehicles unlawful to drive
Biederman v. FCA US LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 458831, No. 23-cv-06640-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2025) This is a putative class action over alleged “defeat devices” in diesel engines installed in RAM 2500 and 3500 pick-up trucks. Plaintiffs … Continue reading
Washington’s anti-spam law covers any misrepresentations in subject line of commercial email
In re Brown v. Old Navy, LLC, 2025 WL 1132243, — P.3d —-, No. 102592-1 (Wash. Apr. 17, 2025) Deciding a certified question, the Washington Supreme Court held over dissent that the state’s anti-spam law covers all commercial emails with … Continue reading
Canadian-origin “Truffettes de France” are plausibly misleading
James v. Chocmod USA Inc., 2025 WL 950509, No. 1:22-cv-01435 JLT SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2025) Plaintiffs sued over defendant’s “Truffettes de France” (trans. “Truffles from France”), which are, despite the name, made in Canada. They brought the usual … Continue reading
district court misunderstands “fake sale” claims, finds price not to be a “statement”
Nguyen v. Lovesac Co., 2025 WL 950511, No. 2:24-cv-01293-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2025) Weird decision finding that a price isn’t an actionable representation, which—even if true—ignores the difference between a price and a putative former price represented by a … Continue reading
asterisk alone makes front of package claims ambiguous
Wong v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc., 2025 WL 821451, No. 2:24-cv-00901-DAD-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2025) Is an asterisk on the front of a package a get-out-of-jail-free card for false advertising? If the disclosure doesn’t flatly contradict the claim, … Continue reading