Tag Archives: it’s not misleading to advertise the same thing with two names and two prices consumer protection

it’s not misleading to advertise the same thing with two names and two prices

 Lokey v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 2020 WL 6822890, No. 20-cv-04782-LB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2020) Lokey alleged that CVS violated the FAL/UCL/CLRA by marketing its CVS-branded infant pain-and-fever medicine at a higher price (up to two and a half times … Continue reading

Advertisement

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment