Tag Archives: Open legal question doesn’t preclude fees award where manner of litigating is exceptional commercial speech

Tobinick v. Novella, 884 F.3d 1110 (11th Cir. 2018) The court of appeals held that the Octane Fitness standard for “exceptional cases” applied to Lanham Act cases, and that the District Court here didn’t abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s … Continue reading →