Tag Archives: Rogers question: could this art be explicitly misleading? art law

Rogers question: could this art be explicitly misleading?

One reason that Gordon v. Drape Creative is so concerning is that it reads “explicit” to be something other than explicit–maybe a version of falsity by necessary implication, but one that wants to pose transformativeness as the thing that avoids explicit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment