Tag Archives: Slingbox’s addition of ads wasn’t deceptive consumer protection

Slingbox’s addition of ads wasn’t deceptive

In re Sling Media Slingbox Advertising Litig., 202 F. Supp. 3d 352 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) Plaintiffs sued Sling under California law, and in the alternative under the consumer-protection laws of forty-seven other jurisdictions, including under New York General Business Law Ā§ … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment