Tag Archives: trademark

Fourth Circuit rejects attempt to control references to expert services with IP

File under “we need a federal anti-SLAPP law.” Devil’s Advocate, LLC v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., No. 15-1048, 2016 WL 6871905, — Fed.Appx. —- (4th Cir. Nov. 22, 2016) John W. Toothman is a lawyer and the founder of Devil’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tamicus: IP profs’ amicus brief in Lee v. Tam with Christine Farley

Hot off the presses.  Read it here.  Thanks to all who commented and signed on. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2fYVmhY

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mark McKenna reviews Registering Disagreement

At Jotwell, here.  Thanks for the kind review! from Blogger http://ift.tt/2ggKzUy

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Law Review Symposium, Panel Three

Moderated by Shubham Mukherjee Graeme B. Dinwoodie, University of Oxford Law, “Territoriality in the Protection and Enforcement of Trademark Rights” As trade becomes more geog. expansive, so too do TM rights need to expand. Not new: goes back to 1883 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Law Review Symposium, Negotiating IP’s Boundaries in an Evolving World

Panel One – Moderated by Joseph D. Bauer Mark P. McKenna, Notre Dame Law School & Lucas S. Osborn, Campbell Law School, “Trademarks and Digital Goods” BMW sued Turbosquid for hosting digital models of BMW cars—models could be used in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Law Review Symposium, Negotiating IP’s Boundaries in an Evolving World

Panel One – Moderated by Joseph D. Bauer Mark P. McKenna, Notre Dame Law School & Lucas S. Osborn, Campbell Law School, “Trademarks and Digital Goods” BMW sued Turbosquid for hosting digital models of BMW cars—models could be used in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Using others’ product photos to advertise same product isn’t fair use

Minka Lighting, Inc. v. Bath Kitchen Decor, LLC, No. ED CV 13-02370, 2015 WL 12743863 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2015) Minka sells ceiling fans, lighting products, and home accessories.  It exclusively uses (or tries, as the facts show) about 2000 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Gov’t brief in Lee v. Tam

Available here.  They make the same “bumper sticker” argument that I think makes sense. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2016/11/govt-brief-in-lee-v-tam.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Disparaging an unauthorized reseller could violate the Lanham Act

Dentsply Int’l Inc. v. Dental Brands for Less LLC, No. 15 Civ. 8775, 2016 WL 6310777 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2016) Dentsply sued Dental Brands over Dental Brands’ resale of Dentsply’s dental products without Dentsply’s authorization. Dental Brands buys Dentsply’s products … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Spy Phone v. spy phone: Google loses motion to dismiss TM and other claims

Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. Google Inc., No. 15-cv-03756, 2016 WL 6025469 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2016) The plaintiff here, an app maker with a registered mark for Spy Phone for a monitoring app, squeaks past dismissal of its trademark … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment