Tag Archives: trademark

Don’t sell a business and then keep running it

Electrology Laboratory, Inc. v. Kunze, 169 F.Supp.3d 1119 (D. Colo. 2016) Larry Paul Kunze a/k/a Lorenzo Kunzel sold his family business, plaintiff ELI (d/b/a Rocky Mountain Laser College/RMLC), “but couldn’t give it up. So, as the evidence revealed, even while … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Dual use of same mark on customized Jeeps not confusing, court rules

Moab Indus. v. FCA US, LLC, No. 3:12-cv-8247, 2016 WL 5859700 (D. Ariz. Oct. 6, 2016) Moab sued FCA, aka Chrysler, for trademark infringement (via reverse confusion) and state-law dilution based on Chrysler’s use of MOAB on a limited edition … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Right of publicity/passing off blast from the past

From The Spirit of the Times, May 21, 1845 “Gen. Tom Thumb’s father brought suit in Paris, against the manager of a theatre, who announced a play called Tom Pouce, (Thumb,) while the General was exhibiting himself at another place. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

when are state law unfair competition claims preempted?

Duer v. Bensussen Deutsch & Associates, Inc., 2015 WL 11256568, No. 14-CV-01589 (N.D. Ga. Jul. 8, 2015) Very broad preemption finding makes me blog this older case that popped out of Westlaw.  Duer makes medicine dosage adherence tools suitable for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Parody product fails to squeak through the cracks in dilution/infringement claim

VIP Products, LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., No. 14-cv-02057 (D. Az. Sept. 27, 2016) The court denied VIP’s motion for summary judgment on its declaratory judgment action against JDPI, and also kicked out a number of VIP’s defenses, leaving … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Stanford Sociology and Psychology of IP

Session 5: Fairness, efficiency, and distributive justice Discussion leaders: Stephanie Bair: Concepts of ownership/justice in ownership may be universals—studies of children across cultures.  Purpose of IP as understood to be to prevent plagiarism—asking for permission is sufficient, though, in many … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Stanford Sociology & Psychology of IP, branding

Session 4: The sociology and psychology of brands Discussion leaders: Jeanne Fromer: A lot of work in this area. Some is about how consumers react to branding in systematic ways.  Rule of thumb in talking to branding folks: if you … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?

Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations.  Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law.  Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?

Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations.  Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law.  Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

If a body catch a body in high heels

Transformative work of the day?  These “Catcher in the Rye” heels involve both decoupage and paint (for some of the quotes).  What should the copyright/TM analysis look like? from Blogger http://ift.tt/2cwfMRX

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment