Tag Archives: trademark

Parody product fails to squeak through the cracks in dilution/infringement claim

VIP Products, LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., No. 14-cv-02057 (D. Az. Sept. 27, 2016) The court denied VIP’s motion for summary judgment on its declaratory judgment action against JDPI, and also kicked out a number of VIP’s defenses, leaving … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Stanford Sociology and Psychology of IP

Session 5: Fairness, efficiency, and distributive justice Discussion leaders: Stephanie Bair: Concepts of ownership/justice in ownership may be universals—studies of children across cultures.  Purpose of IP as understood to be to prevent plagiarism—asking for permission is sufficient, though, in many … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Stanford Sociology & Psychology of IP, branding

Session 4: The sociology and psychology of brands Discussion leaders: Jeanne Fromer: A lot of work in this area. Some is about how consumers react to branding in systematic ways.  Rule of thumb in talking to branding folks: if you … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?

Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations.  Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law.  Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What can we learn from IP-free zones?

Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces.” They know they can monetize their reputations.  Systems of self-governance often differ from those of formal law.  Attribution preference is not just about fairness/ego. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

If a body catch a body in high heels

Transformative work of the day?  These “Catcher in the Rye” heels involve both decoupage and paint (for some of the quotes).  What should the copyright/TM analysis look like? from Blogger http://ift.tt/2cwfMRX

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

NY false advertising law lacks rigid false/misleading distinction

Classic Liquor Importers, Ltd. v. Spirits International B.V., — F. Supp. 3d —-, 2016 WL 4419457, No. 15 Civ. 6503  (S.D.N.Y. 2016) Classic Liquor is a newcomer to the liquor business that recently launched a line of vodkas under the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Pictures from Canada

Canada, like many other countries, considers “taking unfair advantage” of a trademark to be a distinct problem, making it less favorable to parody and other uses than the U.S. as a matter of formal law.  What difference does that make … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Cthulhu the functional?

Jake Linford has recently expounded in detail about the descriptive or even functional characteristics of certain sounds, making certain “coined” words more useful in marketing.  Here’s a great example from Michael Saler, As If: Modern Enchantment and the Literary Prehistory … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

6th Circuit rejects college players’ Lanham Act, ROP claims

Marshall v. ESPN, No. 15-5753 (6th Cir. August 17, 2016) Plaintiffs claimed that, as college football and basketball players, they had publicity rights in their names and images as used in TV broadcasts.  “Whether referees, assistant coaches, and perhaps even … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment