Monthly Archives: May 2015

DMCA hearings, security research, opponents

Posted on May 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Security research continued, opponents   Copyright Office: Jacqueline Charlesworth Michelle Choe Regan Smith Cy Donnelly Steve Ruhe John Riley Stacy Cheney (NTIA)   Opponents: Christian Troncoso, BSA | The Software Alliance: we support good faith security testing. We are surrounded … Continue reading →

Posted in dmca, drm, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

DMCA hearings: security research proponents

Posted on May 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Library of Congress DMCA exemption hearings   Proposed Class 25: Software – security research This proposed class would allow researchers to circumvent access controls in relation to computer programs, databases, and devices for purposes of good-faith testing, identifying, disclosing, and … Continue reading →

Posted in dmca, drm, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

“Commercial advertising and promotion” can’t be conclusorily alleged

Posted on May 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Jus Punjabi, LLC v. Get Punjabi Inc., 2015 WL 2400182, No. 1:14–cv–3318 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 2015)   Jus Punjabi, a cable and satellite television network serving the U.S. Punjabi community, sued Get Punjabi, a rival television network.  Jus Punjabi allegedly … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

"Commercial advertising and promotion" can’t be conclusorily alleged

Posted on May 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Jus Punjabi, LLC v. Get Punjabi Inc., 2015 WL 2400182, No. 1:14–cv–3318 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 2015)   Jus Punjabi, a cable and satellite television network serving the U.S. Punjabi community, sued Get Punjabi, a rival television network.  Jus Punjabi allegedly … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

DMCA hearings, LA: Guest post by Betsy Rosenblatt

Posted on May 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Guest post from Betsy Rosenblatt   The triennial Copyright Office DMCA exemption hearings began on May 19 for three days in Los Angeles before moving next week to Washington, D.C. for four more days.  I attended the first two days, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

DMCA hearings, LA: Guest post by Betsy Rosenblatt

Posted on May 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Guest post from Betsy Rosenblatt   The triennial Copyright Office DMCA exemption hearings began on May 19 for three days in Los Angeles before moving next week to Washington, D.C. for four more days.  I attended the first two days, … Continue reading →

Posted in dmca, drm, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

False claims of FDA approval actionable under Lanham Act and state law

Posted on May 22, 2015 by rtushnet

Innovative Health Solutions, Inc. v. DyAnsys, Inc., 2015 WL 2398931, No. 14-cv-05207 (N.D. Cal. May 19, 2015)   IHS sells a medical device called P–STIM.  DyAnsys used to be the distributor of P-STIM in the US, but after it lost … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

False claims of FDA approval actionable under Lanham Act and state law

Posted on May 22, 2015 by rtushnet

Innovative Health Solutions, Inc. v. DyAnsys, Inc., 2015 WL 2398931, No. 14-cv-05207 (N.D. Cal. May 19, 2015)   IHS sells a medical device called P–STIM.  DyAnsys used to be the distributor of P-STIM in the US, but after it lost … Continue reading →

Posted in fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

FDA pre-approval doesn’t bar Lanham Act false advertising claim against device

Posted on May 21, 2015 by rtushnet

Church & Dwight Co. v. SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics, GMBH, No. 14 Civ. 00585, 2015 WL 2359467 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2015)   Earlier discussion.  SPD argued that the FDCA barred Lanham Act false advertising claims against it because the FDA … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FDA pre-approval doesn’t bar Lanham Act false advertising claim against device

Posted on May 21, 2015 by rtushnet

Church & Dwight Co. v. SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics, GMBH, No. 14 Civ. 00585, 2015 WL 2359467 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2015)   Earlier discussion.  SPD argued that the FDCA barred Lanham Act false advertising claims against it because the FDA … Continue reading →

Posted in fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment