-
Recent Posts
- Disparate impact isn’t “unfair” for consumer protection purposes, court indicates
- over dissent, 5th Circuit applies Lanham Act to political speech
- competitor plausibly alleged injury by alleging consumers changed behavior upon discovering the truth
- retail/outlet claims for Vineyard Vines scrape past motion to dismiss
- adjectival order matters (some) in finding literal falsity
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: September 2016
Speech in study would be commercial if knowingly false, court rules
Crossfit, Inc. v. National Strength & Conditioning Ass’n, 2016 WL 5118530, No. 14cv1191 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 21, 2016) CrossFit generates revenue by credentialing and certifying fitness trainers for a fee and through licensing the CrossFit trademark and other intellectual property … Continue reading
FTC wins second appellate victory over 230 defense
FTC v. LeadClick Media, LLC, 15‐1009‐cv (2d Cir. Sept. 23, 2016) The FTC and Connecticut sued LeadClick over its role in the use of deceptive websites to market weight loss products. LeadClick managed a network of affiliates/publishers to advertise the … Continue reading
43(a) question of the day
Actors who played doctors on TV evoke their roles for Cigna ad: any false endorsement implications for Cigna? Tagline: “They’ve saved lives on TV, but now they’re helping save lives for real by teaming up with Cigna to encourage America … Continue reading
Advertising question of the day
Does the following pose any advertising issues? Does it matter whether the business sells non-organic food? Thanks to James Grimmelmann for the photo. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2cOICPs
“unique” and “innovative” are puffery
LoggerHead Tools, LLC v. Sears Holdings Corp., 2016 WL 5080028, No. 12-cv-9033 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 20, 2016) LoggerHead sued Sears under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law for false advertising; the court granted summary judgment to Sears. LoggerHead sells … Continue reading
How does race affect copyrightable expression?
Fulks v. Knowles-Carter, No. 16-Civ-4278 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2016), contains an interesting bit about race and copyrightable expression: [P]laintiff argues that the “race of the characters in the [Film] is irrelevant to the total concept and feel of a film … Continue reading
Packaging trade dress needs specific design, not just color, to be inherently distinctive
Forney Industries, Inc. v. Daco of Missouri, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2016 WL 4501941 (10th Cir.. Aug. 29, 2016) Forney makes retail metalworking parts and accessories and claimed a protected trade dress in the coloration of its packaging, described as: … Continue reading
Using photos of competitor’s product confers statutory Lanham Act standing on competitor
Joseph Paul Corp. v. Trademark Custom Homes, Inc., 2016 WL 4944370, No. 3:16-CV-1651 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2016) JP Homes sued Trademark, its principal, and homeowners for alleged violations of the Lanham Act and copyright infringement. JP Homes alleged that … Continue reading
Celebrity spokesperson isn’t directly liable under California consumer protection law
Luman v. Theismann, 647 Fed.Appx. 804 (9th Cir. 2016) Plaintiffs sued NAC Marketing Company and Joe Theismann for their advertising statements about NAC’s Super Beta Prostate product, bringing warranty claims as well as the usual California statutory claims. Because one … Continue reading
No duty to disclose child labor production in California, court rules
Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc., 162 F.Supp.3d 1016 (N.D. Cal. 2016) Mars sells chocolate, some of which comes from cocoa beans from Côte d’Ivoire, where trafficked children and forced laborers “wield dangerous tools, transport heavy loads, and face exposure to toxic … Continue reading
