-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: April 2017
Georgetown Tech Law Review seeks submissions
From the editors: The Georgetown Law Technology Review is soliciting content for fall 2017 publication. Founded in 2015, the Review seeks to build a common forum for technologists, lawyers, and policymakers to discuss the increasingly complex intersections between law and … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Georgetown Tech Law Review seeks submissions cfps, privacy
Leave a comment
Presumptions and evidence of causation both work in false advertising cases
Robroy Indus.–Texas, LLC v. Thomas & Betts Corp., No. 15-CV-512, No. 2:16-CV-198, 2017 WL 1370545 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 10, 2017) T&B and Robroy compete in the market for PVC-coated electrical conduit, which is used to carry electrical wiring in buildings … Continue reading
Having a product in development isn’t enough for Lanham Act standing
Pulse Health LLC v. Akers Biosciences, Inc., 2017 WL 1371272, No. 16-cv-01919 (D. Or. Apr. 14, 2017) Pulse was formed to develop a product that can measure aldehyde molecules in human breath via a non-invasive hand-held device. Its device was … Continue reading
My colleague Laura K. Donohue, now on Twitter
Where she will be tweeting about the national security state, privacy, et cetera. She’s got comprehensive knowledge and a prime location, so take a look! from Blogger http://ift.tt/2o8jure
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged My colleague Laura K. Donohue, now on Twitter privacy
Leave a comment
Grange grudge: court orders disclaimer to resolve confusing corporate status
National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange, 2016 WL 8730678, No. 16-201 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2016) As relevant here, plaintiffs sued the California Guild and Robert McFarland for false advertisement and unfair competition … Continue reading
Uber can’t get taxi false advertising case dismissed on 12(b)(6)
Delux Cab v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2017 WL 1354791, No. 16cv3057 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2017) Delux, a cab company in San Diego, sued Uber for false advertising about “the purported exceptional safety of Uber” and the relative unsafety of … Continue reading
Who registers the watchmen? court needs more info in (c) case
Sara Designs, Inc. v. A Classic Time Watch Co., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2017 WL 627461, No. 16CV03638 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2017) Sara sued for copyright infringement, trade dress infringement, state trademark infringement and dilution, unfair trade practices, and deceptive practices … Continue reading
Lack of damages dooms false marking, advertising claims
Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp., 2017 WL 1349278, No. 2016-2318 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2017) Gravelle sued his competitor Kaba for falsely marking its key-cutting machines as “patent pending” for a time, as Kaba eventually admitted, and sought monetary relief … Continue reading
Lack of damages dooms false marking, advertising claims
Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp., 2017 WL 1349278, No. 2016-2318 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2017) Gravelle sued his competitor Kaba for falsely marking its key-cutting machines as “patent pending” for a time, as Kaba eventually admitted, and sought monetary relief … Continue reading
Ordinary false advertising isn’t disparagement for insurance purposes
Vitamin Health, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., — Fed.Appx. —-, 2017 WL 1325263, No. 16-1724 (6th Cir. Apr. 11, 2017) Vitamin Health makes products intended to reduce the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration, advertising that its products contain … Continue reading
