Author Archives: rtushnet

Lysol can’t quickly clean up this mess of anti-Clorox ads

Clorox Co. v. Reckitt Benckiser Gp. PLC, 2019 WL 3068322, No. 19-cv-01452-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2019) Clorox sued Reckitt for false advertising of its Lysol cleaning products under the Lanham Act and California’s UCL/FAL. The court found tiny parts … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Monster Energy can’t show falsity, can show tortious interference (but not irreparable injury)

Monster Energy Co. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2019 WL 3099711, No. EDCV 18-1882 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2019) The court denied a preliminary injunction on Monster’s claim that Vital falsely advertised its “Super Creatine” as “creatine,” because there … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

TrueCar’s false claims not subject to car dealers’ challenge without evidence of injury

Dependable Sales & Service, Inc. v. Truecar, Inc., 2019 WL 3067115, No. 15-cv-1742 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2019) Lots of prior rulings about various aspects of this false advertising claim in the general field of auto sales. TrueCar successfully moved … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reading list: the dark side of meme culture

 Whitney Phillips, It Wasn’t Just the Trolls: Early Internet Culture, “Fun,” and the Fires of Exclusionary Laughter, Social Media + Society: I realized that many of the young reporters who initially helped amplify the white nationalist “alt right” by pointing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Imaginative makeup color names as descriptive fair use

Hard Candy, LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc., 921 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2019) Hard Candy sued Anastasia, a competitor in the cosmetics industry, for infringement based on one of Anastasia’s “Glow Kits,” flip-open makeup palettes containing four different shades … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

When © trips courts up: Lack of access to standards makes false ad claim impossible to resolve

Wing Enterprises, Inc. v. Tricam Industries, Inc., 2019 WL 2994465, No. 17-cv-1769 (ECT/ECW) (D. Minn. Jul. 9, 2019) This false advertising case about multi-position ladders turns out to involve an important copyright issue that the Supreme Court has taken up: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Competitor’s false advertising case against MLM income claims can proceed

Youngevity Int’l v. Smith, No. 16-CV-704-BTM-JLB, 2019 WL 2918161 (S.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2019) This Lanham Act case involves, among other things, alleged misrepresentations relating to the MLM aspects of defendants’ business pitched to potential “affiliates.”  First, defendants argued that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Rogers still mostly works in 9th Circuit, despite Honey Badger’s best efforts

Caiz v. Roberts, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2019 WL 1755421 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2019) In Gordon v. Drape Creative, 909 F.3d 257 (9th Cir. 2018), the Honey Badger case, the Ninth Circuit began a process that could make Rogers v. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amazon strictly liable for product defect but 230 preempts failure to warn claim

Oberdorf v. Amazon.com Inc., No. 18-1041 (3d Cir. Jul. 3, 2019) Oberdorf was injured by a retractable dog leash “sold” by Amazon on behalf of a third-party vendor, who shipped the leash directly to Oberdorf. The district court found that, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Warhol wins on fair use of photo (but should’ve won on substantial similarity)

Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, No. 17-cv-2532 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2019) In some sense, this fair use case is a foregone conclusion; even the terrible Saderup decision made an exception for Andy Warhol, because … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment