Author Archives: rtushnet

California SCt rejects record-keeping ascertainability requirement

Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., — P.3d —-, 2019 WL 3403895, S246490 (Cal. Jul. 29, 2019) Noel brought a putative class action on behalf of retail purchasers of an inflatable outdoor pool sold in packaging that allegedly misled buyers about … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Amicus brief in Smith v. Drake fair use case

With the able assistance of UCI’s IP clinic, led by Jack Lerner, I worked on an amicus brief in this case arguing that fair use should continue to be a flexible standard that accommodates various types of transformativeness. The brief … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ornamental use of pun is aesthetically functional (defendant-side functionality in the wild!)

LTTB LLC v. Redbubble, Inc., No.  18-cv-00509-RS (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2019) Defendant-side functionality! This is a concept I’ve been arguing exists for years (see, e.g., the result in Louboutin v. YSL), and now it is no longer immanent in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Duck, duck, noninfringement: TM and (c) claims over distinct duck designs fail

Great American Duck Races Inc. v. Kangaroo Mf’g Inc., No. CV-17-00212-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Jul. 19, 2019) Despite some bad reasoning equating intent to compete with (relevant) intent to confuse, the court rejects bad copyright and trademark claims based on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Lysol can’t quickly clean up this mess of anti-Clorox ads

Clorox Co. v. Reckitt Benckiser Gp. PLC, 2019 WL 3068322, No. 19-cv-01452-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2019) Clorox sued Reckitt for false advertising of its Lysol cleaning products under the Lanham Act and California’s UCL/FAL. The court found tiny parts … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Monster Energy can’t show falsity, can show tortious interference (but not irreparable injury)

Monster Energy Co. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2019 WL 3099711, No. EDCV 18-1882 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2019) The court denied a preliminary injunction on Monster’s claim that Vital falsely advertised its “Super Creatine” as “creatine,” because there … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

TrueCar’s false claims not subject to car dealers’ challenge without evidence of injury

Dependable Sales & Service, Inc. v. Truecar, Inc., 2019 WL 3067115, No. 15-cv-1742 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2019) Lots of prior rulings about various aspects of this false advertising claim in the general field of auto sales. TrueCar successfully moved … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reading list: the dark side of meme culture

 Whitney Phillips, It Wasn’t Just the Trolls: Early Internet Culture, “Fun,” and the Fires of Exclusionary Laughter, Social Media + Society: I realized that many of the young reporters who initially helped amplify the white nationalist “alt right” by pointing … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Imaginative makeup color names as descriptive fair use

Hard Candy, LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc., 921 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2019) Hard Candy sued Anastasia, a competitor in the cosmetics industry, for infringement based on one of Anastasia’s “Glow Kits,” flip-open makeup palettes containing four different shades … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

When © trips courts up: Lack of access to standards makes false ad claim impossible to resolve

Wing Enterprises, Inc. v. Tricam Industries, Inc., 2019 WL 2994465, No. 17-cv-1769 (ECT/ECW) (D. Minn. Jul. 9, 2019) This false advertising case about multi-position ladders turns out to involve an important copyright issue that the Supreme Court has taken up: … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment