Author Archives: rtushnet

use of P’s jewelry in D’s ad is regular passing off, not reverse passing off

Brighton Collectible, LLC v. Believe Production, Inc., 2017 WL 440255, No. 15-cv-00579 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2017) Brighton sued Believe for infringing Brighton’s copyright in a jewelry design and also engaging in false designation of origin/unfair competition.  In particular, Brighton … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Transformative work of the day, why would you even want that edition

Among the notable things in this story about ridiculously expensive houses, consider the description of a prior house with “a master bedroom modeled after a Louis Vuitton store,” and “a chain saw featuring Rolls-Royce hood ornaments, a giant Louis Vuitton … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Blast from the past: claims to comply with vague industry standard weren’t literally false

Lamons Gasket Co. v. Flexitallic L.P., No. H–14–0247, 2015 WL 12831719 (S.D. Tex. May 13, 2015) The parties competed in the market for spiral wound gaskets and other products used in the oil and gas industry to join and secure … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Advertising a phone with an unauthorized screenshot of an app doesn’t violate the Lanham Act under Dastar

Appjigger GmbH v. BLU Products, Inc., 2016 WL 4119720, No. 15–22313 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2016) Appjigger makes apps, and has an exclusive license for the WP CLOCK software app, which is available both to end users and also for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Blast from the past: false price claims insufficiently pled

Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. American Signature, Inc., 2015 WL 12999664, No. 11-cv-427 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2015) At this point I will just institute a “blast from the past” category for Westclip.  This one made it because of a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Political ad isn’t commercial, can’t be basis of Lanham Act claim

Nichols v. Club for Growth Action, No. 16-220, 2017 WL 420111 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2017) Club for Growth Action is a political organization that broadcast a 30-second political ad on Wisconsin television and the Internet in September 2015, challenging the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Failure to show causation leads court to overturn jury verdict against false advertising

A.L.S. Enters., Inc. v. Robinson Outdoor Prods., LLC, No. 14-CV-500, 2017 WL 393307 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 30, 2017) ALS sued Robinson for false advertising of Robinson’s Trinity scent-control hunting clothing. The jury returned a verdict for ALS, awarding ALS $1.3 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

older case about materiality v. consumer skepticism: a question of fact

Duraflame, Inc. v. Hearthmark, LLC, 2013 WL 12177870, No. CV 12-01205 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2013) Duraflame alleged that many people bought Duraflame’s artificial firelogs because they used renewable resources, and consumers are willing to pay a premium to purchase … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

TCPA survives strict scrutiny

Brickman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 16-cv-00751, 2017 BL 25487 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2017) One criticism of expanding strict scrutiny is that courts will be extremely tempted to find that sensible regulations pass strict scrutiny, thus watering down its protection … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amazon escapes liability for ads & emails touting vendors’ infringing products

Lasoff v. Amazon.com Inc, 2017 WL 372948, No. C16-151 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 26, 2017) Lasoff owns Ingrass, which sells artificial turf and related products.  He sold through Amazon, but in 2013 his sales allegedly began to plummet, both on his … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment