Author Archives: rtushnet

Copyright Office removes insult, adds new one with DMCA agent re-registration process

Apparently one no longer has to provide a fax number to have a complete agent designation, which is good news.  (Welcome to the 21st century!)  But take a look at this password requirement: I’m sorry, CO, but you are not … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New edition, Goldman & Tushnet, Advertising and Marketing Law

Eric Goldman has posted all about it, including an overview and links for where you can get your own fresh copy.  Eric did the heavy lifting on getting this out, and I really appreciate it.  I also am personally satisfied … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New edition, Goldman & Tushnet, Advertising and Marketing Law

Eric Goldman has posted all about it, including an overview and links for where you can get your own fresh copy.  Eric did the heavy lifting on getting this out, and I really appreciate it.  I also am personally satisfied … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Reading List: Legal Amateurism

Legal Amateurism, Annelise Riles  Abstract:  Academics in the humanities and social sciences have often remarked upon the “amateuristic” quality of the analytical tools used by legal scholars. Rather than dismiss this quality out of hand, this paper approaches “legal amateurism” … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

ABA Blawg 100/Hall of Fame

I’ve made the ABA Blawg Hall of Fame, as well as the Blawg 100, which is very nice.  I believe it’s in part a reward for persistence, as I’ve been at this since 2003 (though I only got serious in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

TM question of the day, high heel edition

We know that Louboutin’s red sole mark is only valid as applied to shoes with contrasting uppers.  So, do these shoes infringe?  (In case it’s hard to tell, I’d describe the sole color as a fairly bright pink.)  Do they … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Breakfast break: energy claims not misleading by US standards

Spector v. Mondelēz International, Inc., 178 F.Supp.3d 657 (N.D. Ill. 2016) Mondelēz makes belVita Breakfast Biscuits and Breakfast Bites. Spector allegedly bought packages of Breakfast Biscuits in reliance on the package representations of “NUTRITIOUS STEADY ENERGY ALL MORNING”:  ​ The … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Fourth Circuit rejects attempt to control references to expert services with IP

File under “we need a federal anti-SLAPP law.” Devil’s Advocate, LLC v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., No. 15-1048, 2016 WL 6871905, — Fed.Appx. —- (4th Cir. Nov. 22, 2016) John W. Toothman is a lawyer and the founder of Devil’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Court tentatively holds that NY’s GBL covers damage via personal injury

Carias v. Monsanto Co., 2016 WL 6803780, No. 15-CV-3677 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2016) The plaintiffs filed a putative class action claiming injuries based on their use of Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup. Along with products liability claims, they brought claims under New … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pro tip: don’t refer to delayed TM claim as “lottery ticket”

Dropbox secured a rare laches ruling based in significant part on internal discussions by the other claimant to “dropbox” about how delaying a claim until after Dropbox’s IPO would increase the payout.  Via DuetsBlog. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2geplUQ

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment