Author Archives: rtushnet

ABA Blawg 100/Hall of Fame

I’ve made the ABA Blawg Hall of Fame, as well as the Blawg 100, which is very nice.  I believe it’s in part a reward for persistence, as I’ve been at this since 2003 (though I only got serious in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

TM question of the day, high heel edition

We know that Louboutin’s red sole mark is only valid as applied to shoes with contrasting uppers.  So, do these shoes infringe?  (In case it’s hard to tell, I’d describe the sole color as a fairly bright pink.)  Do they … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Breakfast break: energy claims not misleading by US standards

Spector v. Mondelēz International, Inc., 178 F.Supp.3d 657 (N.D. Ill. 2016) Mondelēz makes belVita Breakfast Biscuits and Breakfast Bites. Spector allegedly bought packages of Breakfast Biscuits in reliance on the package representations of “NUTRITIOUS STEADY ENERGY ALL MORNING”:  ​ The … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Fourth Circuit rejects attempt to control references to expert services with IP

File under “we need a federal anti-SLAPP law.” Devil’s Advocate, LLC v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., No. 15-1048, 2016 WL 6871905, — Fed.Appx. —- (4th Cir. Nov. 22, 2016) John W. Toothman is a lawyer and the founder of Devil’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Court tentatively holds that NY’s GBL covers damage via personal injury

Carias v. Monsanto Co., 2016 WL 6803780, No. 15-CV-3677 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2016) The plaintiffs filed a putative class action claiming injuries based on their use of Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup. Along with products liability claims, they brought claims under New … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pro tip: don’t refer to delayed TM claim as “lottery ticket”

Dropbox secured a rare laches ruling based in significant part on internal discussions by the other claimant to “dropbox” about how delaying a claim until after Dropbox’s IPO would increase the payout.  Via DuetsBlog. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2geplUQ

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Truthful report about injunction not misleading, even if injunction shouldn’t have been issued

Peek v. Whittaker, 2016 WL 6806265,  No. 13-cv-1188 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 17, 2016) The parties, floor care businesses, are in a litigation deathmatch; this case is a follow-on to a state court lawsuit.  Whittaker sold carpet cleaning machines and fluids … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

When Lexmark raises the standard: competitor fails to show harm causation from literal falsity

Snac Lite, LLC v. Nuts ‘N More, LLC, 2016 WL 6778268, No. 14-cv-01695 (N.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2016) Snac Lite sued NNM for misrepresenting the protein content of its specialty nut butters.  The court granted summary judgment, despite past literally … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Jaszi festschrift–abbreviated panel 4

Pam Samuelson Reflections Praised Jaszi’s leadership in fighting White Paper, Digital Future Coalition; the DMCA could have been much worse. Reached out to people who think about copyright ownership who aren’t lawyers. Panel 4 – Pedagogy Plus Joseph Liu and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Jaszi Festschrift, Panel 3 Fair use

Michael Donaldson, Reflections: More lobbyists in Congress for © industries than there are members of Congress.  But fair use guidelines for documentary film weren’t threatening, especially once there was insurance for filmmakers who used the guidelines.  Good fair use decisions, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment