Author Archives: rtushnet

7th Amendment provides jury right for TM profits as proxy for damages

Black & Decker Corp. v. Positec USA Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 4656749, No. 11–cv–5426 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 5, 2015   The parties compete to sell power tools.  B&D alleged that Positec infringed their patents and trademarks in the … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

IPSC: closing comments

Closing Plenary Session   Joshua Sarnoff, DePaul University College of Law: Size affects nature of presentation, time, allotted, depth of development, audience participation.  Makes a personal promise to read papers in sessions he plans to go to—thinks that this will … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

IPSC: closing comments

Closing Plenary Session   Joshua Sarnoff, DePaul University College of Law: Size affects nature of presentation, time, allotted, depth of development, audience participation.  Makes a personal promise to read papers in sessions he plans to go to—thinks that this will … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

IPSC, Copyright Theory III

Copyright Theory III   Abraham Bell, Bar Ilan University The Dual-Grant Theory of Fair Use   Granted rights are limited in order to avoid unnecessarily exceeding the requirements for incentivizing. Fair use is a broad reservation of privileges for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC, Copyright Theory III

Copyright Theory III   Abraham Bell, Bar Ilan University The Dual-Grant Theory of Fair Use   Granted rights are limited in order to avoid unnecessarily exceeding the requirements for incentivizing. Fair use is a broad reservation of privileges for the … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

IPSC: Copyright again

Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis   Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. Porter, influential across the country. Step 1: actual copying, dissection allowed, expert testimony … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ad of the day: does Louboutin have a claim?

Association? Dilution? Would any of the dilution exceptions apply? Via SocImages. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1UtjVT9

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC, Copyright Theory II

Copyright Theory II    Brad Greenberg Columbia Law School Bizarro Copyright   Does having lots of different antennas in one place v. all over the place make a difference to whether there is public performance? Central question of Aereo: looks … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Copyright again

Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis   Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. Porter, influential across the country. Step 1: actual copying, dissection allowed, expert testimony … Continue reading →

Posted in conferences, consumer protection, contracts, copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, music | Leave a comment

Ad of the day: does Louboutin have a claim?

Association? Dilution? Would any of the dilution exceptions apply? Via SocImages. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in dilution, trademark | Leave a comment