Tag Archives: consumer protection

LinkedIn dodges UCL claims because big businesses aren’t covered plaintiffs

Topdevz, LLC v. LinkedIn Corp., 2021 WL 3373914, No. 20-cv-08324-SVK (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021) Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class of advertisers, alleged that LinkedIn overstates the level of actual user engagement with ads on its platform in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Found on road deceptive: “track car” claim plausibly misleading

Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Co., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 2700347, No. 17-21087-CIV-MORENO (S.D. Fla. Jul. 1, 2021) In this multistate class action based on purchases of the Shelby GT350 Mustang, the court granted Ford summary judgment on some claims … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

class action certified with adequate price premium model for “nutritious” claims

McMorrow v. Mondelēz International, Inc., 2021 WL 859137, No. 17-cv-2327-BAS-JLB (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2021) Consumers in California and New York who purchased belVita breakfast biscuits, brought a putative class action alleging that MDLZ labeled the breakfast biscuits as “nutritious,” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Cal. statutory false advertising isn’t fraud and individual reliance isn’t necessary

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner, LLC, 2021 WL 1264423, E073950, — Cal.Rptr.3d —- (Ct. App. 2021) Plaintiffs sought to represent a putative class, bringing claims against a landlord for (1) false advertising; (2) breach of the implied … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Be kind, certify a class

In re KIND LLC “Healthy and All Natural” Litig., 2021 WL 1132147, Nos. 15md2645, 15mc2645 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2021) Plaintiffs sought class certification of their false advertising claims based on the claims that KIND falsely advertised “All Natural / Non-GMO,” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

claims that “infant” formula misleadingly implies special formulation survives

Youngblood v. CVS Pharmacy, 2020 WL 8991698, No. 20-cv-06251-MCS-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2020) Youngblood bought an acetaminophen product for infants, believing based on its packaging that it was specifically formulated for infants and therefore different from CVS’s acetaminophen product … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Vegan butter wins again

Miyoko’s Kitchen v. Ross, No. 20-cv-00893-RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021) Preliminary injunction discussed here; now it’s summary judgment time. The state is allowed to regulate “hormone free” on Miyoko’s “vegan butter,” but Miyoko’s is allowed to use the words/phrases … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bank had no duty to disclose limits to PPP loan applicants

Elizabeth M. Byrnes, Inc. v. Fountainhead Commercial Capital, LLC, 2021 WL 3501518, No. CV 20-04149 DDP (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2021) The CARES Act, among other things, established the Paycheck Protection Program, a $349 billion loan program through which … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

data breaches can lead to a potpourri of claims

In re Blackbaud, Inc., Customer Data Breach Litig., No. 3:20-mn-02972-JMC, MDL No. 2972, 2021 WL 3568394 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2021) Query whether this kind of case will come out differently as TransUnion v. Ramirez gets further assimilated into the law. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

reasonable consumer isn’t required to interpret ingredient list for naturalness

Moore v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC, No. 20-cv-09077-JSW,  2021 WL 3524047 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2021) Moore alleged that GSK falsely labeled certain ChapStick products with the claims “100% Natural,” “Natural,” “Naturally Sourced Ingredients,” and “100% Naturally Sourced … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment