Tag Archives: consumer protection

Uber’s safety claims not all puffery

Posted on July 22, 2015 by rtushnet

L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., — F. Supp. 3d —-, 2015 WL 4397706, No. 15-cv-01257 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2015)   Uber makes various safety-related claims, such as its website’s claims to offer the “SAFEST RIDES ON … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

CD Cal rejects In re GNC for all the right reasons

Posted on July 16, 2015 by rtushnet

Zakaria v. Gerber Products Co., No. 15-cv-00200 (C.D. Cal. July 14, 2015)   Zakaria sued Gerber, bringing the usual California claims, based on Gerber’s alleged misrepresentations that Good Start Gentle infant formula reduces the risk to infants of developing atopic … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

False establishment claims not actionable under consumer protection law

Posted on July 14, 2015 by rtushnet

Aloudi v. Intramedic Research Group, LLC, 2015 WL 4148381, No. 15-cv-00882 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2015)   Aloudi brought the usual California/warranty claims against IRG for its claims about its JavaSLIM product, a “green coffee bean extract weight loss formula.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in different contexts

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark Contexts Do the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? Is assessment of the reaction of the average consumer in trade … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: roles for the consumer in TM

Posted on June 29, 2015 by rtushnet

Seventh Trademark Scholars Roundtable: The Construction of the Consumer in Trade Mark Law   Session 1: Roles for the Consumer in Trade Mark Law What role does the “consumer” (whether “average” or “reasonable” or otherwise) play in trade mark law? … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ninth Circuit rejects class certification because ads differed

Posted on June 29, 2015 by rtushnet

Cabral v. Supple LLC, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2015 WL 3855142, No. 13–55943 (9th Cir. June 23, 2015)   The court of appeals vacated the certification of a class of purchasers of a dietary supplement. The certified class was “[a]ll persons … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Court certifies class against JCPenney for allegedly false “sales”

Posted on June 12, 2015 by rtushnet

Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp., 2015 WL 3478038, No. CV 12–0215 (C.D. Cal. May 18, 2015)   Spann sued JCP, bringing the usual California claims, for allegedly “falsely advertising ‘original’ prices, ‘sale’ prices and corresponding price discounts for its private … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

violation of labeling law is presumptively material and deceptive

Posted on June 11, 2015 by rtushnet

Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., 2015 WL 3398415, No. 11-cv-03082 (N.D. Cal. May 26, 2015) (magistrate judge)   Plaintiffs sued Hain for selling cosmetics whose front labels used the word “organic,” but that did not contain at least 70% … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ascertainability defeats class but EULA doesn’t

Posted on May 15, 2015 by rtushnet

Perrine v. Sega of America, Inc., No. 13-cv-01962, 2015 WL 2227846 (N.D. Cal. May 12, 2015)   Gearbox developed and Sega produced the game “Aliens: Colonial Marines,” “held out as the canon sequel to James Cameron’s 1986 film ‘Aliens.’”  The … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New Jersey court rejects ascertainabilty requirement for class actions

Posted on May 14, 2015 by rtushnet

Daniels v. Hollister Co., — A.3d —-, 2014 WL 8808428, No. A–3629–13T3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 13, 2015)   Of interest because it’s a state court within the Third Circuit rejecting that circuit’s view of “ascertainability” in class … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment