-
Recent Posts
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
- Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
materiality surveys may not need controls
In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., No. 14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I … Continue reading
NYC loses greenwashing case against Exxon and pals
City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp., — N.Y.S.3d —-, 2025 WL 209843, No. 451071/2021 (N.Y.S. Ct. Jan. 14, 2025) Probably not the last we’ll hear about this, but the court dismissed the City’s two consumer protection claims against … Continue reading
GIGO? literal falsity and a remedy mismatch
InSinkErator LLC v. Joneca Co., No. 8:24-cv-02600-JVS-ADS, 2025 WL 250032 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2025) InSinkErator, allegedly the world’s largest manufacturer of garbage disposals for home and commercial use (and to its shame, an entity that sued a TV show … Continue reading
annoyingly redacted opinion finds Block falsely advertised versus TurboTax
Intuit Inc. v. HRB Tax Gp., Inc., 2024 WL 5320392, No. 5:24-cv-00253-BLF (N.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024) Intuit, which makes TurboTax and has had some advertising troubles of its own (hey, check out the IRS Free File program, for taxpayers … Continue reading
materiality survey is in–even with 20 industry employees as respondents
Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Under Armour, INC., 2025 WL 82336, No. 2:20-CV-664-NR (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2025) MET sued Under Armour for multiple things, including false advertising, and here MET sought to exclude the testimony of Under Armour’s consumer … Continue reading
statements about market conditions aren’t about “nature, characteristics, or qualities” under 43(b)
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2025 WL 81877, No. 24-10444-MJJ (D. Mass. Jan. 13, 2025) Nexus sued its competitor Long Grove under the Lanham Act, alleging that Long Grove made false statements about a shortage of fluorescein, … Continue reading
are certificates of analysis and other technical specs commercial speech?
Sweegen, Inc. v. Manus Bio Inc., No. 8:24-cv-01757-JVS-DFM, 2024 WL 5317280 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024) Sweegen is one of the largest suppliers of non-GMO Rebaudioside M or “Reb M” sweetener, manufactured through bioconversion from stevia leaves. Its competitor makes … Continue reading
literal falsity might not matter with sufficiently sophisticated customers
G. W. Aru, LLC v. W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn., No. JKB-22-2636, 2025 WL 45827 (D. Md. Jan. 7, 2025) I’m skipping most of the patent parts, though they are very much present in the case and interact with a … Continue reading
“Target Clean” might certify specific qualities to reasonable consumers
Boyd v. Target Corp., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 4287669, No. 23-CV-02668 (KMM/DJF) (D. Minn. Sept. 25, 2024) This interesting lawsuit relies on Target’s curatorial reputation for the false advertising claim. Target is headquartered in Minnesota and plaintiffs sought to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
“pure” chocolate may be deceptive if it has too much heavy metal
In re Theos Dark Chocolate Litigation, 2024 WL 4336631, No. 23-cv-02739-HSG, — F.Supp.3d —- (N.D. Cal. Sept. 27, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that Theo’s dark chocolate bars contained, or risked containing, the heavy metals cadmium, lead, and arsenic at levels exceeding … Continue reading