Tag Archives: lawsuit against supplement for implying arthritis claims not preempted consumer protection

lawsuit against supplement for implying arthritis claims not preempted

Yamagata v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, 2020 WL 1505724, No. 17-cv-03529-VC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2020) A very clear opinion. Yamagata challenged RB’s advertising for joint supplements under California and NY law. As the court explained: “If the boxes are best understood … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment