Tag Archives: Lumps in materiality survey fail to justify its exclusion damages

Lumps in materiality survey fail to justify its exclusion

Select Comfort Corp. v. Tempur Sealy Int’l, Inc., No. 13-2451, 2016 WL 5496340 (D. Minn. Sept. 28, 2016) The court resolves various motions surrounding expert testimony in this false advertising case about the effects of certain comparative claims on Select … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment