-
Recent Posts
- trademark law firm loses trademark lawsuit
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: Notice and Notice Failure at BU
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 8
Robert Bone – Notice Failure and Defenses in Trademark Law Bone’s basic argument: Principal notice issue in TM is uncertainty about scope, and principal problem is chilling effects. Bone finds an important distinction between unauthorized uses that implicate rights … Continue reading
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 7
Mark Lemley – Ready for Patenting Patent’s problematic approach to what we want to encourage when we grant a patent. Long struggle with what you are giving us is simply an idea/conception or an actual thing/reduction to practice. Various … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 7 conferences, patent
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 6
Margaret Jane Radin – Patent Notice and the Trouble with Plain Meaning Notice is a cost and a cost-saver; hard to figure out its overall profile. Plain meaning as ever-receding ideal. Philips v. AWH (Fed. Cir. 2005); Festo … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 6 conferences, patent
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 5
Lydia Loren – Fixation as Notice in Copyright Law 3 different roles: (1) protectability; (2) infringement—reproduction etc. require fixation; (3) preemption—no preemption for unfixed works. What kind of a notice function might fixation play in each area? Statutory … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 5 conferences
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, Panel 4
Orly Lobel – Enforceability TBD: From Status to Contract in IP and Human Capital Law Noncompete agreements: used to blur lines of IP regimes, make it harder to tell what is owned/ownable. Trade secret lawsuits are used in anticompetitive … Continue reading
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 3
Pamela Samuelson – Notice Failures Arising from Copyright Duration Rules Agrees w/ other expressions of concern about notice failures in copyright—here she focuses on notice failures related to the long duration of copyrights. More information about work’s © status … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 3 conferences, patent
Leave a comment