Tag Archives: remedies

Cy pres recipient in false advertising case has to be false-advertising-focused group, court rules

 You might think that class action rules can be a bit like Calvinball, and I’d be hard pressed to disagree. Here’s another hurdle to jump, although it’s certainly jumpable. Hawes v. Macy’s Inc., 2023 WL 8811499, No. 1:17-cv-754 (S.D. Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

false advertising is harder to prove than TM infringement because of the injury requirement (not to mention materiality)

ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, INC., 2023 WL 8604148, No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023) The parties are compounding pharmacies that focus on medications used in optometry and ophthalmology. Section 503A compounding pharmacies fill prescriptions for individual patients. Section 503B … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Timeshare developer wins disgorgement against timeshare exit marketers despite unclean hands

Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. v. Timeshare Lawyers P.A., 2023 WL 7109914, No. 20-24681-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2023) Intro: In this trial, the Court has learned that tens of thousands of timeshare owners have been victimized twice: first by the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

plaintiff has standing to seek injunctive relief against allegedly falsely advertised penile implant

Peña v. International Medical Devices, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-03391-SSS-PLAx, 2023 WL 5667568 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2023) Plaintiff brought the usual California statutory claims against Penuma, a penile implant/procedure, for alleged misstatements about Penuma’s safety and efficacy. Here, we deal only … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AMG Capital didn’t change monetary remedies for civil contempt

Federal Trade Commission v. National Urological Group, Inc., 2023 WL 5541756 No. 21-14161, — F.4th —- (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2023) Nearly 20 years ago, the FTC sued appellants, alleging they had misrepresented their weight-loss products to consumers. The district … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market

Vitamins Online, Inc. v. Heartwise, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 4189604, Nos. 20-4126, 21-4152 (10th Cir. Jun. 27, 2023) Proceedings below most recently blogged here. Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case

Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. v. Timeshare Lawyers P.A., 2023 WL 3510374, No. 20-24681-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. May 17, 2023) The court grants these timeshare plaintiffs’ motion for a bench trial, ruling that the Seventh Amendment doesn’t guarantee a jury trial in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why do people fall for pyramid schemes? FTC v. Noland offers examples

 FTC v. Noland, 20-cv-00047-DWL (D. Ariz. May 11, 2023) The decision in FTC v. Noland is notable for its discussion of the testimony of a number of witnesses supporting the defendant who seem to have been largely victims of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

no disgorgement under state law when false advertising wasn’t shown to result in sales

Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, 2023 WL 3004625, No. 16 C 03401 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 19, 2023) Previous discussion. A jury found that defendant HBI engaged in unfair competition and violated the Illinois Uniform Deceptive … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

consumer class settlement can’t include injunctive relief unless there’s Art. III standing to seek injunctive relief

Williams v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 2906311, No. 22-11232 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) The court of appeals reversed approval of a settlement that would have provided injunctive relief and up to $8 million in monetary … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment